| Ratification of Supreme Allied Commander | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 20 2011, 12:41 PM (78 Views) | |
| Jatenvention | Jul 20 2011, 12:41 PM Post #1 |
|
Here we will discuss the ratification of the Supreme Allied Commander: New Squa. I think it is important for us to first determine the jobs of both the Supreme Allied Commander and the Head of Regional Security. Personally, my view is that the Supreme Allied Commander focuses more on external issues regarding security whereas the Head of Regional Security focuses more on internal issues. For example, the Head of Regional Security makes sure that all WA members endorse the current president. What are my fellow senators' opinions? |
![]() |
|
| Saoil | Jul 23 2011, 06:43 PM Post #2 |
|
Thank you Mr. President, through you to the members: I personally am weary of the gentleman in question. He has only recently came to our region, and seems a wee bit too eager for power and appointment. However, that is my personal vibe. Thank you, I yeild back the balance of my time. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Senate Floor · Next Topic » |






6:34 PM Jul 10