|
Welcome
|
|||||||||
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| The Royal Family of Albion Act [2010]; First Reading | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 3 2010, 05:22 PM (138 Views) | |
| John Franklin | Dec 3 2010, 05:22 PM Post #1 |
|
We can do what we always thought was the impossible
|
Author: Franklin, John First Parliamentary Reading
I propose this for consideration. Please discuss. |
![]() |
|
| Nicholas Stillwell | Dec 3 2010, 05:26 PM Post #2 |
![]()
|
I like this bill, but should we describe the Queen's and Crown Prince's powers and abilities are? |
![]() |
|
| John Franklin | Dec 3 2010, 06:30 PM Post #3 |
|
We can do what we always thought was the impossible
|
I'm open to the idea Any amendments made shall be reviewed once proposed in a second reading.
|
![]() |
|
| William Bettingham | Dec 3 2010, 07:17 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
So, before even reading this, I am just going to say that before we handle our statue, the most important legislative topic, before we go on and work with other legislation. |
![]() |
|
| John Franklin | Dec 9 2010, 02:59 PM Post #5 |
|
We can do what we always thought was the impossible
|
Since the Statute of Laws act is now in effect (awaiting but shouldn't be long the King's assent) we can now get this going again. |
![]() |
|
| Nicholas Stillwell | Dec 9 2010, 05:46 PM Post #6 |
![]()
|
I agree, however, I think the Crown prince should act as King in the King's absence |
![]() |
|
| William Bettingham | Dec 10 2010, 03:05 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
These are my problems:
1. The King should not have ceremonial assent, it should be called Royal Assent. Which means that if the King does not like a piece of legislation, if he provides a reason for doing so, may veto it. We have to have an impartial power to check the power of the House of Commons. 2. I think we should add the power to accept a new government. Meaning that it is the King's responsibility to accept the Prime Minister's request to form a government upon his behalf. 3. His Majesty should also have the power to appoint members of the Royal Family and award titles, but this may be more appropriate in the Royalty section. |
![]() |
|
| Nicholas Stillwell | Dec 10 2010, 05:18 PM Post #8 |
![]()
|
Good points Mr. Bettingham, I agree |
![]() |
|
| John Franklin | Dec 11 2010, 01:24 PM Post #9 |
|
We can do what we always thought was the impossible
|
I agree with all except your first point. I am not going through the hassle of what we witnessed in the United Kingdom with a silly idea the Monarch is above the elected representatives of the region. If parliament passes a Law then the Monarch shall have no right to veto something that the people has put their trust in those to do what is right for them. I understand your monarch beliefs in the sense they should have underlying power, but I certainly do not believe it to be so in a democratic society. The biggest downfall is letting one person hold too much power. The power of 'Royal Assent' if passed is already too much.
Edited by John Franklin, Dec 11 2010, 01:25 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lord Anthony Blackwood | Dec 17 2010, 08:21 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Deputy Prime Minister
|
This region is ruled as a monarchy and as such the power of Royal Assent should be granted to his majesty. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · House of Commons · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:21 PM Jul 11
|







Any amendments made shall be reviewed once proposed in a second reading.



2:21 PM Jul 11