Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Alterra - More than a new region, a new world! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you can only post in the "Welcome to Alterra" forum, although you have read-only access to the entire board. If you join our community, you'll be receive full access and be able to use all member-only features. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Once you've registered, go to the New Members forum and apply for citizenship. You can also learn about our world there and in the Alterra links in the menu. You'll be granted full access as soon as you register. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| G Groups | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 25 2011, 06:14 AM (4,784 Views) | |
| Raz | May 28 2011, 09:17 PM Post #171 |
![]()
Ruler of The Republic of Vantel
|
Meh, that's fine but I still worry, mostly about human nature. |
![]() |
|
| Greater Laddneia | May 28 2011, 09:18 PM Post #172 |
|
Science Adviser
|
Agreed. The only power it would have would be that it can influence its members to follow each other... |
![]() |
|
| Raz | May 28 2011, 09:20 PM Post #173 |
![]()
Ruler of The Republic of Vantel
|
Yeah, human nature likes to twist that a lot, seen it before. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | May 28 2011, 09:28 PM Post #174 |
|
Deleted User
|
I think one larger I is better |
|
|
| Leraq | May 28 2011, 09:42 PM Post #175 |
|
And I still beg to differ for the reasons I offered earlier. I reiterate : varying sizes of groups are better because different discussions need differing sizes of summit to offer the best environment for the debate. I also thought it was decided that we would use the aforementioned two group system in the end...
Edited by Leraq, May 28 2011, 09:55 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Leraq | May 28 2011, 09:57 PM Post #176 |
|
Understood... I still think the two system is better than one |
![]() |
|
| Emerald | May 28 2011, 10:01 PM Post #177 |
|
Two are better... |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | May 28 2011, 10:26 PM Post #178 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well, Koussath won't listen to either, so it doesn't matter to me. |
|
|
| Demoness | May 28 2011, 10:59 PM Post #179 |
|
Amoratae Dea Augusta
|
Then just assume my country suggested Fenwick and the country was ultimately eliminated for the reasons stated (if we aren't RPing this). As to the rest of the debate... What debate? You guys went on for another four pages about why or why not this initiative should happen, which is what half of the posts before it were. If it were solely an OOC popularity contest, then I would think some of those nations would be taken off if not solely for their lack of activity, particularly in the last two months. The fact that after Ladd said he's going to not listen to any more debates on the matter that Vantel's exclusion is brought up is a bit suspect. If we want to get into IC versus OOC and organizations, then why don't we start heading into AA territory? As I've noted before, there is at least one nation that should outright be kicked out and a few borderline, yet the AA is OOCly composed of whomever actually wants to participate regardless of an IC right to be there. If you want to hardline it, then we should also be starting with historical resolutions and weeding out nations that didn't/wouldn't have signed proposals and ejecting them before moving onto modern day. The point is that no matter what, OOC will leak into any IC organization and no one's protested the previous ones. About half of the I9 are the most vocal nations, either OOCly or ICly while the others have a good case to be there ICly. As I said, I really don't care. ICly, I am the most powerful nation in southern Xia; OOCly, that's because I'm practically the only nation in South Xia until recently. I've even questioned Demoness' inclusion in this list based on OOC/IC reasoning (somewhere in the first five pages I think), so it's not like I really have a stake in this. I'm just wondering how much of this protest is real and how much is pettiness because "my uber nation isn't included!" |
![]() |
|
| Leraq | May 28 2011, 11:07 PM Post #180 |
|
Agreed about the arguing: I think at this point we need to just go with what we've got: ladds made a good I9 based on OOC and IC and I think it needs to be left alone. It is agreed these summits will be good and need no more examination as to their workings. All we should be worrying about now is choosing the 18. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
6:59 PM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy










6:59 PM Jul 11