Viewing Single Post From: 6/6/08 Results

Viewing Single Post From: 6/6/08 Results
Technolink	Jun 6 2008, 01:42 PM
The Overlord Posts: 1,496 Group: Admin Member #1 Joined: May 9, 2007	Kev redid the tests for accuracy, I am only analyzing normal bow, booster and strafe (not that it matters), and normal xbow booster and strafe. Here are my results using various methods (both are 30 seconds clips): Arrows shot in 30 seconds: bow-40 xbow-42 Frame by frame analysis: I'm really not trusting this one, with strafe its difficult to measure one attack to the next bow- .73~.74 (82~81 spm) xbow- .73~.74 (82~81 spm) Audio Peak to Peak analysis: Bow - .76 (79 spm) Xbow - .72 (82 spm http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/7668/bowpeakni4.png - picture http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/7104/xbowpeakep0.png - pciture Beats per second interpreter analysis (different program then peak to peak) Bow - Xbow - From my peak to peak analysis, it shows a clear indication of them starting very similar, only to have the xbow go faster O_o http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/9253/bowxbowchartwe5.png - picture You can clearly see that the xbow has a full shot over the bow in that 30 second clip I am 100% positive that I did not mix up the tracks (as the xbow has a distinctive "poot" sound after it, while the bow is a "feew") All the tests but the frame-by-frame agree, xbow speed is 82 spm (as always), while bow speed is now apparently 80 spm. WTF! Gentlemen, we are now officially in bizarre-o world. I don't know whether to make heads or tails over this, should we redo math, why would nexon do this, did they feel BM was more powerful then MM? Rawr confused* Edited by Technolink, Jun 6 2008, 01:44 PM.
	"Drawing" by Kev

6/6/08 Results · The Timing