Important Links: Boktai Official Page ; Zoktai Official Page ; Shinbok Official Page (Japanese) ; Boktai DS Homepage (Japanese) / Lunar Knights Homepage (English)
| Welcome to Bokura no Taiyō Online. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| About huffy; .... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 21 2007, 12:30 AM (367 Views) | |
| Higgins Von Higgings | Jul 21 2007, 12:30 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Badass Overlord
|
I would like to clarify some comments I made recently regarding Mr. LordHuffnPuff. To begin at the beginning, the outcome of the struggle will ultimately be decided based on the number and influence of people fully informed about Mr. Huffy's teachings, committed to Mr. Huffy's defeat, and organized under sound leadership. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: It seems that no one else is telling you that only Mr. Huffy can praise an institution that is as splenetic and self-deceiving as he himself. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, there's something fishy about Mr. Huffy's asseverations. I think he's up to something, something obstreperous and perhaps even dictatorial. Please remember that Mr. Huffy has commented that he can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. More concretely, it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why does he always have to be such a party pooper?" The answer to this question gives the key not only to world history, but to all human culture. Now, perhaps you think I'm imagining things. Perhaps you think that Mr. Huffy really isn't going to fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units. Well, I wish it were just my imagination. But you know, it has been brought to my attention that most uninformed proponents of paternalism lost interest in their own future long before they joined his camp. While this is true, I once overheard him say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? He said that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he likes to cite poll results that "prove" that perfidious leeches of one sort or another make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to suggest the kind of politics and policies that are needed to restore good sense to this important debate have no right to complain when he and his operatives throw away our freedom, our honor, and our future. So that there may be no misunderstanding, let me make it clear that I want nothing more -- or less -- than to make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change. To that task I have consecrated my life, and I invite you to do likewise. It must be pointed out over and over again to Mr. Huffy's allies and, in a broader sense, to homophobic spoiled brats that we can divide Mr. Huffy's hypnopompic insights into three categories: cocky, amoral, and saturnine. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Mr. Huffy want to manufacture and compile daunting lists of imaginary transgressions committed against him. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, if his shills had even an ounce of integrity, they would kick butt and take names. Mr. Huffy does not want to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character because he is frightful, clumsy, crude, and pesky (though, granted, Mr. Huffy is all of the aforementioned), but rather because Mr. Huffy is stepping over the line when he attempts to blow the whole situation way out of proportion -- way over the line. If I try really, really hard, I can almost see why he would want to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his advocates to live in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously tolerant. Didn't Mr. Huffy tell his bootlickers that he wants to infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating directionless information? Did he first give any thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his slaphappy newsgroup postings. Although I respect Mr. Huffy's right to free speech just as I respect it for chauvinistic, obdurate reavers, immoral bums, and worthless kooks, if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that he would authorize, promote, celebrate, and legitimize poxy mysticism. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Mr. Huffy could have made the same prediction. Doesn't it strike you as odd that his cheerleaders assert that the masses are socially inept and unfit for citizenship? He is truly possessed by the devil. Interestingly, he doesn't seem to care about that. Mr. Huffy acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. Any correspondence between what he says and the truth is purely coincidental. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that Mr. Huffy has any control over. But that's inconsequential, because even if one is opposed to covinous, uneducated Bonapartism (and I am), then surely, the irony is that Mr. Huffy's most antihumanist insults are also his most obtuse. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent." Mr. Huffy's grandiose promises of plenty for each have yielded grinding poverty for all. At least, that certainly seems to be the implication in several of the accounts I've heard. If a cogent, logical argument entered Mr. Huffy's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Stick your nose into anything Mr. Huffy has written recently, and you'll get a good whiff of unsavory hooliganism. No matter how much talk and analysis occurs, he is planning to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. This does not bode well for the future, because he has been trying for some time to convince people that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. Don't believe his hype! Mr. Huffy has just been offering that line as a means to dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost stories. He has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of his successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Mr. Huffy so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that Mr. Huffy hates it when you say that people like him are beyond help. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime, if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you. Ostensibly, Mr. Huffy does not intend to pander to domineering tossers, but in fact, there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of teetotalism, and there are those who are not. Mr. Huffy is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why if one could get a Ph.D. in Opportunism, he would be the first in line to have one. Contrary to the impression that stultiloquent hell-raisers offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their snow jobs. How many of Mr. Huffy's attendants are content to sit around doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the world around them? I'd hazard to guess that the number is pretty high. Sometime in the future Mr. Huffy will turn our country into an impolitic cesspool overrun with scum, disease, and crime. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will doubtlessly happen if we don't reveal the nature and activity of Mr. Huffy's habitués and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. Mr. Huffy keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. The purpose of this deception may be to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. Or maybe the purpose is to undermine the foundations of society until a single thrust suffices to make the entire edifice collapse. Oh what a tangled web Mr. Huffy weaves when first he practices to deceive. In closing, I consider this letter to be required reading for everyone who still cares that Mr. LordHuffnPuff bickers and argues over petty things. Unfortunately, with our nation's media being as controlled as it is, there's no way that this letter will be widely publicized. Some of my colleagues recommended that I write a letter about how we have our work cut out for us. This is that letter. Before I say anything else, let me remind Mr. LordHuffnPuff that it would be charitable of me not to mention that I never asked him to tell me how to live my life. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that if he gets his way, none of us will be able to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Therefore, we must not let him leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned. Is anyone else out there as struck as I am by his utter disregard for morality and humanity? The reason I ask is that I'm not a callow person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to Mr. Huffy's goombahs and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Mr. Huffy has for his brethren because that's what Mr. Huffy wants. Now, I am all for freedom of speech, but if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that Mr. Huffy would exploit the masses. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Mr. Huffy could have made the same prediction. My current plan is to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. Yes, Mr. Huffy will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. There is certainly no limit to Mr. Huffy's impudence. We can therefore extrapolate that either Mr. Huffy has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. Maybe some day, he will finally stop trying to judge people based solely on hearsay. Don't hold your breath, though. When Mr. Huffy made his puppy-dog assistants wag their little tails by promising to let them inure us to unpleasant pessimism, I realized for the first time that Mr. Huffy knows how to lie. It's too bad he doesn't yet understand the ramifications of lying. I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him convince the most blasphemous troublemakers I've ever seen that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. If we are powerless to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse, it is because we have allowed Mr. Huffy to take us all on a thoroughly reckless ride into the unknown. Inasmuch as I disagree with his accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet his speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. In the course of my work, I regularly come in contact with pugnacious gaberlunzies, and most of them also feel that only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to make a genuine contribution to human society. But the first step is to acknowledge that if he got his way, he'd be able to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. If Mr. Huffy is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. I almost forgot: You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with what I call longiloquent slubberdegullions?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that a deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not vapid energizes him to open new avenues for the expression of hate. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. Just because Mr. Huffy and his mercenaries don't like being labelled as "pudibund thieves" or "acrimonious hellions" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. Often, the lure of an articulate new pundit, a well-financed attention-getting program, an effective audience generator, hot new "inside" information, or a professionally produced exposé is irresistible to lazy pothouse drunks who want to create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. Rest assured, his effusions are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about his caustic behavior, but about the way that no reasonable person would deny that there is considerable evidence to show that he is serious about wanting to curry favor with obstreperous hatemongers of one sort or another using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their "value", their "importance", their "educational mission", and other negligent nonsense. If you doubt this, just ask around. Mr. Huffy is not only immoral, but amoral. I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Mr. Huffy and his accomplices, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that to Mr. Huffy's mind, we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. So that means that he is omnipotent, right? No, not right. The truth is that I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I, not being one of the many unscrupulous anthropophagi of this world, assert that there is, because what I take much more seriously than sadistic sewer rats are the most dodgy twaddlers you'll ever see. And let me tell you, Mr. Huffy is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of slimy speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations -- and that's just the short list! Is that such a difficult concept? The objection may still be raised that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. At first glance, this sounds almost believable. Yet the following must be borne in mind: Mr. Huffy operates on an international scale to talk about you and me in terms which are not fit to be repeated. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to counteract the subtle, but pervasive, social message that says that we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as Mr. Huffy. Am I angry? You bet. I know in my heart of hearts that he is the Grand High Pooh-Bah of Trotskyism. I, speaking as someone who is not a rude, drugged-out fugitive, challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. Even when Mr. Huffy isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth. If you looked up "amateurish" in the dictionary, you'd probably see his picture. Mr. Huffy presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to don the mantel of emotionalism and twist my words six ways for Sunday. What, then, does "ultrastandardization" mean? It means considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. He upholds sin as sacred. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but I once overheard him say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? He said that censorship could benefit us. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that I want to pronounce the truth and renounce the lies. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because I unequivocally feel that he has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. Mr. Huffy obviously has none, or he wouldn't teach mingy concepts to children. Mr. Huffy spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue he's excited about this week is resistentialism, which says to me that it's our responsibility to perform noble deeds. That's the first step in trying to free people from the fetters of incendiarism's poisonous embrace, and it's the only way to educate the public on a range of issues. It is never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to Mr. Huffy's obnoxious, nasty credos is, but one unfortunate fact remains clear: Mr. Huffy's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Mr. Huffy is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. His bromides manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: skewer me over a pit barbecue. Phase two: pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a psychotic, tactless coterie of animalism. Mr. Huffy's expostulations are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, Mr. Huffy's stratagems have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply intransigent. Now, not only are they both nutty and subversive, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that if Mr. Huffy can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If Mr. Huffy can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. One of the things I find quite interesting is listening to other people's takes on things. For instance, I recently overheard some folks remark that before Mr. Huffy initiated a collectivism flap to help promote his disaffected expositions, people everywhere were expected to break the neck of his policy of pauperism once and for all. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that almost every day, Mr. Huffy outreaches himself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's doubtlessly breathtaking to watch him. Even if one is opposed to gormless sexism (and I am), then surely, if the only way to fight tooth and nail against Mr. Huffy is for me to hang myself by the neck until dead, then so be it. It would indisputably be worth it because I have never been in favor of being gratuitously unruly. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to point out the glaring contradiction between his idealized view of boosterism and reality. I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset Mr. Huffy. Here's what I have to say to them: Mr. Huffy labels anyone he doesn't like as "gruesome". That might well be a better description of him. Yes, Mr. Huffy may have some superficial charm, but he uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. He and I disagree about our civic duties. I feel that we must do our utmost to create and nurture a true spirit of community as expeditiously as possible. Mr. Huffy, on the other hand, believes that solipsism is a noble goal. He talks loudly about family values and personal responsibility, but when it comes to backing up those words with actions, all Mr. Huffy does is disparage and ridicule our traditional heroes and role models. I think I've dished it out to Mr. LordHuffnPuff as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say that sometimes, the worst kinds of feckless, unsympathetic yobbos there are are so unenlightened, they merit special attention. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Inarabitta | Jul 21 2007, 12:31 AM Post #2 |
![]()
WOOOOBBUFFET!
![]()
|
I heard huffy has a nice *** o: |
![]() Like some sort of Daft Punk.... | |
![]() |
|
| Blues | Jul 21 2007, 12:35 AM Post #3 |
|
Darkie
![]()
|
Congratulations, you managed to find the site that creates letters of complaint. |
![]() |
|
| Higgins Von Higgings | Jul 21 2007, 12:44 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Badass Overlord
|
Tell evereyone >.> |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Sabby | Jul 21 2007, 12:56 AM Post #5 |
|
Unregistered
|
I actually read the first two paragraphs of that *splode* |
|
|
| Sol | Jul 21 2007, 01:12 AM Post #6 |
![]()
LET'S TAP
|
tl;dr |
![]() ![]() "This is all we could find, sir." | |
![]() |
|
| LordHuffnPuff (RollSoul) | Jul 21 2007, 01:14 AM Post #7 |
|
Bouncy
![]()
|
http://www.outpostnine.com/forum/showpost....77&postcount=34 Copypaste much? Also, I read the entire thing, and had you actually written yourself, I would have responded as such: Come now, Mr. Copain. Do you not see that without me, there would be no one against whom you could rebel? Without culture, there can be no counter-culture. It's safe to say that you created me! |
Credits to 主任 ![]() Com'on.... you know you want to... CLICK IT!!!!!!! Lake Hikari Asakura,Apr 12 2008, 06:48 AM: Obviously, Brawl is a H-Game. | |
![]() |
|
| Higgins Von Higgings | Jul 21 2007, 03:29 AM Post #8 |
![]()
Badass Overlord
|
If you raad the whole thing you would notice that the words arn't the same. I actually got this from somewhere else, and used word to replace all the names. THEN I got ahold of the websites Link (the one that generated the origional ver of this).... So ya... Your a bit off XD |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| SabataTDB | Jul 28 2007, 04:16 AM Post #9 |
![]()
Seireijuu
|
I really don't feel like reading that |
Credit for SSBB sprites go to AbyssWolf of deviantart![]() ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Spam Board · Next Topic » |














Credits to 主任 




2:09 PM Jul 11
Affiliates and Links



