Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Casey Anthony Trial Verdict
Topic Started: July 5, 2011, 9:18 pm (904 Views)
Boston Pitty
Member Avatar
Rawr
She can't be tried again.
Offline | Profile Quote
 
nolvorite

You guys do realize the jury were carefully selected so that they won't automatically assume she's guilty based on what they see on the news. It seems as if everyone else assumes shes guilty.
Posted Image
the cloud soup. OPEN NOW -- like on facebok /////////////// like on twiter
Offline | Profile Quote
 
Swim
Member Avatar
Woot.
She IS. They just don't have enough evidence to prove it.
Posted Image
Rest in peace Salt.
Forum Chat Staff, June 2011-October 2011
Offline | Profile Quote
 
nolvorite

Swim
July 26, 2011, 5:47 pm
She IS. They just don't have enough evidence to prove it.
you can't absolutely know for sure she's guilty though.
Posted Image
the cloud soup. OPEN NOW -- like on facebok /////////////// like on twiter
Offline | Profile Quote
 
Swim
Member Avatar
Woot.
The evidence is overwhelming.
Posted Image
Rest in peace Salt.
Forum Chat Staff, June 2011-October 2011
Offline | Profile Quote
 
Moo

Swim
July 26, 2011, 5:47 pm
She IS. They just don't have enough evidence to prove it.
Swim
 
The evidence is overwhelming.
It can't be both. :p Either the evidence was overwhelming and entirely ignored (unlikely, especially in a case with so much media attention) or there wasn't enough evidence; the former is about corruption, the latter is...well, justification for the outcome really. From what she was charged with, there was enough to convict her of misleading the investigation - which is inherently suspicious since an innocent parent wanting to find their child does not try to deceive the people looking for said child - but that alone isn't enough to say conclusively that Casey killed Caylee. :-/

Even a brief glance at the arguments presented, the investigation, Casey lying about several key things - it paints a picture of great suspicion. If she didn't commit the murder, she certainly was in some way linked to it. Dubious as her character is, the law would be going down a rather dark path if credible material evidence (being accepted by the jury) wasn't required to convict someone of murder.

It's tragic really.
Offline | Profile Quote
 
nolvorite

I like to assume that not everyone can be absolutely guilty of murder enough to kill them. Innocent people get killed under the death penalty. What do you know, maybe Casey was really innocent after all (its possible; just saying)
Posted Image
the cloud soup. OPEN NOW -- like on facebok /////////////// like on twiter
Offline | Profile Quote
 
Boston Pitty
Member Avatar
Rawr
Maybe she planned it, but didn't use her own hands. Maybe She used someone else.
Offline | Profile Quote
 
Mr Me
Member Avatar
C'est Tout Bon
Everyone can think what they want, hopefully science will invent some technology to see if someone's guilty or not.
And just remember, when the morning wind blows away, just enjoy the day, for our time is good until it's gone.
Offline | Profile Quote
 
Ice Puppy
Member Avatar
^ He's so cute ^
Has anyone tried a lie detector test on here?
See the + in my profile? Click it. Say somthin nice to me :)
Myself
 
He was a rude Sun of A Dog!
Offline | Profile Quote
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Sciences, Global News, & Debates · Next Topic »

Boston Pitty © 2014-2015