| Nike Dunk SB Womens uk online; Nike Dunk SB Womens uk online | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 18 2015, 05:32 AM (8 Views) | |
| leishen | Dec 18 2015, 05:32 AM Post #1 |
|
Nike Free 5.0 2015 airmaxruns.uk sole heelThe Nike Free 5.0 2015 is lightweight, flexible, and incredibly comfortable. If your sole reason for wanting them is for casual use, go out and get a pair right now, they are that good. For running, they aren¡¯t fast and they aren¡¯t super cushioned so not the best choice for an all-around trainer. But for short to moderate length runs where you want a very flexible, minimally controlling ride with some cushion they are a solid option. And if, like me, you couldn¡¯t wear the 2014 version due to that tight band over the forefoot, rest assured that the problem has now been fixed. The majority of the sole is exposed midsole cushion, so you can barely hear your footfalls while running in them ¨C I love a silent shoe! The tradeoff to this design is that there is minimal outsole coverage ¨C rubber pods are only present at the back outer heel and under the big toe. As such, sole durability is something to keep an eye on if you tend to be a scuffer. Interestingly, my wear pattern only seems to be from the anteriormost heel pod forward through the midfoot ¨C much more of a midfoot landing wear Nike Free 5.0 cheap sale pattern than I tend to observe in most other shoes that I run in.You can see that after 40 miles I¡¯ve ground down the protruding portions of the white pods directly above and to the right the 4.0 in the image belowm wondering if the slightly rounded heel, curved sole, and flexibility of the shoe have something to do with this more anterior wear pattern? Where all of the Nike Free models are similar is in the flexibility and feel of the sole. The Nike Free design works really well with my stride as I hate shoes that try to control my foot movement. The siping (grooves) in the sole allows my foot to contact and move into pronation very smoothly and I never feel like the shoe is controlling my movement. I¡¯ve honestly found it really hard to not pull these shoes out for most of my recent runs (though the Saucony Kinvara 5 is giving them a run for the money as current favorites). I¡¯ve run just over 40 miles in them so far, with a max long run of 14 miles. I¡¯ve run from easy pace down to 5K pace. They¡¯ve worked well for just about everything. I¡¯d have no hesitation in taking them beyond 14 miles in a single run, I might even consider them for a marathon. They are a bit too flexible for my taste for speed or a 5K, and the sole grooves would probably collect too much debris for off-road use, but they are versatile enough to handle just about anything else I could throw at them. 4. Midfoot Fit. In contrast, to the forefoot, the midfoot of the 5.0 is roomier and more comfortable on my foot, and that might in part be due to the fact that it has a more traditional tongue instead of the bootie-style design of the 3.0. I ge Nike Air Max 2015 uk t a bit of pressure on the top of my foot in the 3.0 due to the integrated tongue and thus am less likely to use it as a casual shoe for long-term wear. One concern present with every Free shoe is that the grooves in the sole tend to pick up rocks and other small road debris. I¡¯ve certainly picked up my share of pebbles in the 3.0, but no huge rocks that have forced me to stop for a clean-up during a run. That being said, I wouldn¡¯t recommend takin Nike Free uk online sale g these off-road if you are worried about picking up debris. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · [#1] Experiment · Next Topic » |





6:58 PM Jul 11