Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Iron Warlock | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 28 2016, 10:44 PM (1,466 Views) | |
| CouncilOfShadows | Apr 12 2016, 01:57 PM Post #21 |
|
You could have it against half the result rolled for the Psychic Phenomena, adding the Perils of the Warp result if there was one. |
![]() |
|
| Eisenritter | Apr 12 2016, 04:16 PM Post #22 |
![]()
Old Iron Knight
|
I said "quick," not "thorough." Edited, and proofed against Atlantean fuckery besides. |
![]() |
|
| Eisenritter | Jun 12 2016, 08:25 PM Post #23 |
![]()
Old Iron Knight
|
Added Poker Face back in. Just to be petty.
|
![]() |
|
| weredrago2 | Jun 12 2016, 08:27 PM Post #24 |
|
He Who Posts Too Much
|
I'm cool with it. |
![]() |
|
| Eisenritter | Jun 26 2016, 07:41 PM Post #25 |
![]()
Old Iron Knight
|
Edits in! Fatal Mastery has returned in the form of "magic Tearing," as opposed to that weird wording that allowed it to pass as critical damage instead, while Piercing Mastery has been added back in for Aura Penetration for those who desire it in this class. You may also notice I've changed the class names. This is at least partly because the old names felt a bit weighted toward the "hurr durr ebil warlock" stereotype; the new ones are chosen based on the theme naming present in the class's advancement feats, as well as Warhammer Fantasy's eight winds of magic. It also stalls out the "one level should be named for the class" argument, which I don't terribly mind bowing to in this case because "warlock" is kinduva cool word anyway. |
![]() |
|
| weredrago2 | Jun 26 2016, 09:03 PM Post #26 |
|
He Who Posts Too Much
|
Fatal Mastery should say 'causes at least one wound' instead of 'deal 1 point of damage'. We don't want people confusing damage and wounds. The last instance of 'one' in Piercing Mastery should be replaced with '1', since we're talking numbers for it. Everything else is fine. |
![]() |
|
| Eisenritter | Jun 26 2016, 09:05 PM Post #27 |
![]()
Old Iron Knight
|
Confusing damage and wounds is exactly why I have it worded that way, though? Waiting for Username's input then, since he's the one who brought it up as broken to begin with... |
![]() |
|
| weredrago2 | Jun 26 2016, 09:26 PM Post #28 |
|
He Who Posts Too Much
|
Wait, so you do want to confuse damage and wounds as it is now, or not? Your feat says 'deal 1 damage', when damage is always reduced by Resilience. You can just say it always deals a minimum of one wound, like Tearing does. |
![]() |
|
| Eisenritter | Jun 26 2016, 09:44 PM Post #29 |
![]()
Old Iron Knight
|
This is the reading Username had of it, weredrago, and this is why we're discussing it now. I'm reading this as Magic Tearing What Scales, he seems to have taken it as Magic Gauss Cannon What Scales. Given that it was named "fatal," I somehow imagine that Soulblazer had in fact intended the latter, but I'm going to try and make my definition as clear as possible. I do in fact want this to be Magic Tearing. Every 2 raises is 1 hit point that the target loses regardless of Resilience or Aura. With that in mind, I'll use whatever wording would make that clearest. |
![]() |
|
| Eisenritter | Jul 15 2016, 09:49 AM Post #30 |
![]()
Old Iron Knight
|
Revised level completion bonus. Feels like this guts Fettered Push a bit, though. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Classes · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:08 PM Jul 11
|








2:08 PM Jul 11