Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Locked Topic
Day 2
Topic Started: Sep 1 2011, 08:58 PM (3,719 Views)
Ryuma
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
The mafia tend to be less aggressive, unless they're bussing a scumbuddy. If Akainu flipped mafia I would have investigated M. M. C.

I don't like to reveal all my suspects. It gives the mafia a better idea about what lynches they can instigate, and what to do to make themselves look better.

And I don't like picking a suspected player to investigate. I like to pick someone no one would expect so the results are less likely to be tampered with. It's probably not a big deal in this set-up considering it's item based, but I don't want to take chances.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Chopperini
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
Koshiro
Sep 1 2011, 11:08 PM
Chopperini
Sep 1 2011, 10:24 PM
Do ya not understand? The people who die are gettin' buried with the fishies along with the items in their possession. And dead people don't speak, last I checked.
You sound pretty confident considering TWO townies died last night.
So what's your theory, then? Killers bein' all un-professional-like and leavin' behind evidence? That don't make sense to me.

Akainu was lynched, not murdered, and it was 'fore none of us even had a chance to open our items. An' he died clasping and melting his item.

And since 2 of us woke up dead this morning, I'm assuming one of 'em was shot with a gun. Hence the logical conclusion, in my opinion 'course, that there's 2 guns and therefore could be 2 of anything.

Also if ya read the opening post carefully, the broken scanner was found next to the mole. So's I was assuming the hat was the one who was item-less. And with a grand total of 6 posts, it don't strike me as unlikely that he ain't found any item of his own. That, and hats probably ain't so good at digging.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Iceburg
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
Chopperini broke a basic custom of investigation, and that is answering for others. It's not something that should be done lightly, if ever. If it's something simple, then there's no reason for the person asked not to answer it. The only time you would need to step in is when townies start talking about things that are mostly irrelevant, or when they misread facts. Otherwise you're offering a way out to someone who might have cracked otherwise.

There's a straight-forward case on Hoe, but I almost feel like it doesn't need to be explained. Hoe declared early on that he wouldn't vote on Day one, which sufficiently means that he declared that he would be useless on Day one. He's higher on my list, because he posted twice as much as any other genuine lurker, and made an effort to acknowledge the wagon. It implies that he's looking for a way to stay active without having to vote.

Johnny is another one who's been moving subtle-like. He hasn't posted nearly at all. He's got a lot of company in that respect. What made him stand out, was that his few posts were actually on topic. It gives the impression that he's trying to appear town, while staying off the radar. With the small amount that he's given us to work with, it's not enough for me to vote him, but enough to simply point out. If he comes around today, there's plenty of time to disprove this first impression.

MC Mizzole started a wagon that led to a mislynch. She started it for the right reasons, and stuck with it, (aside from further evidence) because it was also the right thing to do. A Day One lynch is a good thing. It shows the mafia that they can be killed at any time. It makes them nervous, they'll get desperate, which means slips.

Charlos was a good pick for Day One because we wouldn't lose anything. Day Two usually means flips, means reports, means reactions. Going after Charlos now, is actually less effective, as we will likely run into a better suspect during Day Two. Now we have to deal with lurkers, longer.

Nmaa...I'm going to cut this post short. I'll bring up more as the day goes on. Still a lot of people to hear from, and I don't want to make someone's case for them.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Chopperini
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
Iceburg
Sep 2 2011, 01:27 AM
Chopperini broke a basic custom of investigation, and that is answering for others. It's not something that should be done lightly, if ever. If it's something simple, then there's no reason for the person asked not to answer it. The only time you would need to step in is when townies start talking about things that are mostly irrelevant, or when they misread facts. Otherwise you're offering a way out to someone who might have cracked otherwise.
Wait, what? It ain't like I'm making excuses for nobody. It ain't like I came up with some elaborate defense theory or nothing. I was just statin' what seemed most obvious ta me, capisce? I sees that pretty much as fact considerin' the item loss on day one.

The only question bein' asked was who else has a scanner, and ain't no reply to that gonna prove or disprove anythin'. I don't even see a reason why nobody would wanna withhold that there information.

From my opening post before any of 'em accusations I's been tryin' ta make sense of tha basic facts. And I just don't think it makes no sense to go off on accusations 'cause ya think your item was unique. But either way without more peoples here to give their input there ain't much to proceed with on that front.

If ya wanted me to be Johhny Tightlips then I do apologize, he called in sick today. I was just thinkin' out loud is all.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Iceburg
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
If you didn't do anything wrong, then don't defend yourself. You got the whole 'not-apologizing' thing down, though.

Nmaa...Town cannot wait for everyone to be on the same page. We find people who aren't helping, and we get rid of them. By voting.

(Also, I think that it is ironic that I got an extra vote, considering that I'm a mayor. :orly: )
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Kalifa
Member Avatar
inept treasure hunter
morning. I read the first page and will read the rest when I finished my post.

I want to confess something.

I killed Merry.
I'm sorry. I received a gun Day 1 and I wanted to use it, as it would disappear on Day 2. I read the Day 1 thread and Merry's aggressive play really made me believe that she is Mafia, trying to lead the town.
Seems I was wrong, I'm sorry.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Kalifa
Member Avatar
inept treasure hunter
Chopperini feels attacked very fast.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Iceburg
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
Nmaa... I knew someone was going to get hurt.

As I just got through saying, don't defend yourself/apologize if you didn't do anything wrong. I'm sure you weren't alone in your suspicious of Miss Merry Christmas. The fact that you've come forth is very helpful to town.

Whether or not we still lynch you, has yet to be determined. You were absent for nearly all of Day One. No vote to reference either. Yet you posted enough to get an item. (Six posts seems to be enough apparently, just as it was for Koshiro.) You were fortunate enough to receive a gun, and you shot.

I've already stated that I believe Ms. Merry Christmas was doing the right thing, but she did have several opponents yesterday.

Did you think that she wouldn't be lynched the next day, so you had to shoot her sooner than later?

Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Spacey
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
Good day!

I had a Shield yesterday which more or less functions like a bodyguard as far as I can see. I didn't want to use it though because I was not ready to risk my life for people I have no real read on (I was expecting another gun).
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Iceburg
Member Avatar
3rd rate treasure hunter
So you're saying that it would save someone at the cost of yourself? It's not a straightforward protection power?

Also: Really? Not one person you'd want to protect?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Day Threads · Next Topic »
Locked Topic