| Welcome to Round Table Knights Clan. Enjoy your visit! |
| Empire Total War | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 13 2008, 11:18 PM (3,437 Views) | |
| Tomek of Silesia | Jun 3 2009, 06:48 AM Post #211 |
![]()
Former Knight
|
100$!? I payed 120 PLN = 45$
|
![]() |
|
| Caradoc of Mercia | Jun 3 2009, 09:36 AM Post #212 |
|
Knight
|
Mainly yes, completed the long campaign.
|
![]() |
|
| stoicblitzer | Jun 3 2009, 12:55 PM Post #213 |
![]()
Retired Knight
|
i thought so. every time i load up the community page, i see that you got some more sp achievements. can't really blame you as mp is just...below par. |
![]() |
|
| Caradoc of Mercia | Jun 3 2009, 01:40 PM Post #214 |
|
Knight
|
Nah MP is fairly decent so far, though perhaps a little lacking in variety, but probably is far better currently than RTW was in terms of balance and they're actually making significant balance changes to try to improve it. I know you like whining about everything, so I won't stop you.
|
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 3 2009, 02:08 PM Post #215 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
I beat the campaigns on all settings, all difficulties, and they didn't give me achievements. Even achievement whoring wasn't fun, and I love to whore. |
![]() |
|
| stoicblitzer | Jun 3 2009, 04:52 PM Post #216 |
![]()
Retired Knight
|
It's not just me. I guess I'm just the loudest. They can fix balance all they want, but if there are only 3 shitty team land maps then it's not going to help. the longer there are 3 shitty team land maps, then the more etw will die. |
![]() |
|
| Mercurius of Cappadocia | Jun 3 2009, 07:13 PM Post #217 |
|
King of the Round Table Knights
|
I agree with the map complaint, of course.... ridiculous of them. I bet they were trying to see if they could bundle maps into an expansion, or some crap like that.... Still... tournaments are requiring map packs. That means there are many people with the map packs, currently..... but belligerence is bliss.... I always say. |
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 3 2009, 07:16 PM Post #218 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
I thought you always said, stupid is, stupid does...or... |
![]() |
|
| Drowningpool | Jun 4 2009, 03:08 AM Post #219 |
|
leave it to gunner24 to make shitty maps :rolleyes: |
![]() |
|
| Drowningpool | Jun 11 2009, 09:19 PM Post #220 |
|
Eh? im dling special forces from a torrent which is taking a shiteload of time since only 13 people out of 250+ are seeding this ###### better be worth it. |
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 11 2009, 11:16 PM Post #221 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
s'not |
![]() |
|
| stoicblitzer | Jun 12 2009, 01:07 AM Post #222 |
![]()
Retired Knight
|
it takes a long time downloading from steam. getting it from torrents is gonna take a few days methinks. it isn't worth it ultimately. |
![]() |
|
| Barrett of Maidstone | Jun 13 2009, 04:34 PM Post #223 |
|
Retired Knight
|
Not worth it dp, ive lost all interest in it... total war mp is pants |
![]() |
|
| Dinadan of Logris | Jun 13 2009, 04:52 PM Post #224 |
|
Master of Spam
|
Yea, Bazz is pants @ TW MP
|
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 13 2009, 06:36 PM Post #225 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
what the hell is pants but bazz, ca are making it betta! SM sez so! you fail at life becuz u has no faith in TW, the bestest game ever! </sarcasm> |
![]() |
|
| Drowningpool | Jun 14 2009, 01:34 AM Post #226 |
|
my IEs been ######ed and still cant get it to work, but i made a new user account and it works :/ anyway yea its ruff, not as bad as you peeps put it out. main thing that pisses me off is the faction restrictions on EVERYTHING. |
![]() |
|
| stoicblitzer | Jun 14 2009, 02:33 AM Post #227 |
![]()
Retired Knight
|
you've played it for an hour and can you even play mp? |
![]() |
|
| Adelmo Of Otranto | Jun 14 2009, 10:43 AM Post #228 |
|
Head Knight
|
Not all of us dislike ETW. Many of the elements that make a great TW MP are there, they are just missing a few pieces from the puzzle, (wider variety of multiplayer team maps being the biggest disapointment). The problem was that CA promised us far more than they gave to us. Had they not made false claims, more people would have been happy with what they got. |
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 14 2009, 01:01 PM Post #229 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
The problem is, this is always the case with them. There is always potential, and they never come close to realizing it. |
![]() |
|
| Dinadan of Logris | Jun 14 2009, 01:28 PM Post #230 |
|
Master of Spam
|
I think they have realized about all potential of this design. ETW is a pretty good game made of it, and multiplayer experience is defined by the people, not just the game. I found it to be quite fun. "Pants" is brit slang for "rubbish", also a british expression.
|
![]() |
|
| Barrett of Maidstone | Jun 14 2009, 01:35 PM Post #231 |
|
Retired Knight
|
Thanks din
|
![]() |
|
| stoicblitzer | Jun 14 2009, 06:04 PM Post #232 |
![]()
Retired Knight
|
ETW MP bad. |
![]() |
|
| Dinadan of Logris | Jun 14 2009, 06:05 PM Post #233 |
|
Master of Spam
|
Four legs good?
|
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 14 2009, 06:11 PM Post #234 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
But the MP experience shouldn't have to be defined by the people. You shouldn't have to play with particular people to enjoy the game. That's the reason why L4D failed. With people you know, it's awesome, but with people you don't, rage quitters and griefers kill the game. There are no penalties for being a douchebag. |
![]() |
|
| Dinadan of Logris | Jun 14 2009, 07:01 PM Post #235 |
|
Master of Spam
|
People don't always act like you want them to, and there's not always something you can do against this. Isn't life just harsh? :lol: As far as I can tell, MP experience is always defined by the people, don't see how it couldn't be or why it shouldn't be. Show me!!
|
![]() |
|
| YellowMelon | Jun 14 2009, 07:26 PM Post #236 |
![]()
Retired Applicant
|
What I'm saying is, there should be checks made to prevent retarded behaviour. If people disconnect, make it so they have a connection rating. In C&C, players have reputations points for their behaviour while playing. Things. Like. That. |
![]() |
|
| Dinadan of Logris | Jun 14 2009, 07:46 PM Post #237 |
|
Master of Spam
|
They have reputation points so that you can play with particular people and enjoy the game?
|
![]() |
|
| Drowningpool | Jun 15 2009, 03:42 PM Post #238 |
|
I dotn know, at thetime i played till turn 1712. but started all over till i figured out how to apply Tech. then i played again till i figured out the trade routes africa/ etc, so i started over again. now im at 1730 with teh brits and im owneing everything. but those tosser dutch beat me to utlizing all of those trade ports and im allied to them atm. I wont be playing mp anytime soon, nor care to for some reason. i dotn think i am able to anyway since it is ripped. But the very FIRST thing i did was went into single player called "battle"*?* and then looked at my screen and said "######?" so i natrually wetn to land battle, as the others were irrelevent at the time. and soon found out the factions were restricted to all playable factions i nthe campiananand 13C, i was natrually pissed since i wanted to ATLEAST play as a natives, or knights of st. john or someone else that would actually may be fun playing as. instead of the same ###### i will be playing in campiagn. recall them saying factions were unlockable. though ive yet to finish a campiagn din said there not. i recall CA stating that plainly there were unloackables... FFS why do i even take what they say to heart anymore. |
![]() |
|
| Mercurius of Cappadocia | Jun 15 2009, 06:57 PM Post #239 |
|
King of the Round Table Knights
|
You can DL a patch from tw center, or etc.... |
![]() |
|
| stoicblitzer | Jun 15 2009, 08:16 PM Post #240 |
![]()
Retired Knight
|
I think there are mods to unlock all factions for mp. I don't know if they work for sp. |
![]() |
|
| Dinadan of Logris | Jun 15 2009, 09:05 PM Post #241 |
|
Master of Spam
|
There is at least one mod out there that enables you to play campaign with any faction. When it came out, it worked but had a fog of war issue: you had to move your armies before you actually saw your land at the start. Or something. It's also possible to unlock factions for custom/mp battles seperately with modding. |
![]() |
|
| Drowningpool | Jun 15 2009, 09:09 PM Post #242 |
|
not for 1.0 from what i saw. Edit: anyway found a few, none of which say if the newer patchs are required or not, i assume so but dled anyway. 4tpy ftw |
![]() |
|
| Mercurius of Cappadocia | Jun 16 2009, 02:33 AM Post #243 |
|
King of the Round Table Knights
|
Sorry... I should've said a mod, not a patch. There are a few mods that enable the factions... not much of a mod, obviously. |
![]() |
|
| Drowningpool | Jun 17 2009, 09:46 PM Post #244 |
|
well i jsut manually removed teh tracers, much better now. thoguh i havent seen if it worked for art yet. right now im jsut making some Stat edits Btw why does austria get a bonus in line inf? i ask cause im tempted to even it out. if anyone should have a troop bonus shouldnt it be russia or ottomans? |
![]() |
|
| Barrett of Maidstone | Jun 17 2009, 09:49 PM Post #245 |
|
Retired Knight
|
More numbers but much poorer morale, dnt know why they did it.. but its an attempt to give some form of variety |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The Portcullis · Next Topic » |









this ###### better be worth it.

2:39 PM Jul 11