Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Ourfooty.com.au is unfortunately closed. So this is our new home. The rules won't be as heavily enforced here, but try not to get too carried away in the best interest of the great community we have become. |
| MRP | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 21 Jul 2014, 01:22 PM (834 Views) | |
| Tigerboy | 21 Jul 2014, 01:22 PM Post #1 |
|
Head of being F'n awesome
|
2 weeks for Robinson, they went medium impact which I think is over the top but Adams did have to leave the ground so who knows. Definitely deserved a week as he left the ground and it was high and had other options. Adams vs White only got Adams a reprimand thanks to an early plea and good record |
![]() |
|
| GoBlues101 | 21 Jul 2014, 03:47 PM Post #2 |
|
Churr
|
Sounds about right, Buddy did just about the same thing not long ago. But Robinson doesn't fall under the marquee player rule... |
![]() |
|
| Forum Guy | 21 Jul 2014, 04:54 PM Post #3 |
|
Graduate of the PieGirl School of Quoting
|
had to go, whether it got him high or not it certainly looked vicious, one of the hardest bumps ive ever seen |
![]() |
|
| Paulski | 21 Jul 2014, 08:02 PM Post #4 |
|
If it was on a Port player he would have got off |
![]() |
|
| Forum Guy | 21 Jul 2014, 08:11 PM Post #5 |
|
Graduate of the PieGirl School of Quoting
|
obviously! can you believe there was contention over Jack Watts high hit on Wingard? it was a free every day of the week |
![]() |
|
| Paulski | 21 Jul 2014, 08:29 PM Post #6 |
|
Not on Wingard. |
![]() |
|
| Forum Guy | 21 Jul 2014, 08:56 PM Post #7 |
|
Graduate of the PieGirl School of Quoting
|
he has to work so hard for his frees, its th only way the opposition can stop him, remember that dog Glass?! |
![]() |
|
| Bov | 22 Jul 2014, 08:46 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Sir
|
Did Glass play for the Dogs? |
![]() |
|
| Forum Guy | 23 Jul 2014, 12:32 AM Post #9 |
|
Graduate of the PieGirl School of Quoting
|
he may as well have! such were his dog ways! |
![]() |
|
| Tigerboy | 28 Jul 2014, 05:03 PM Post #10 |
|
Head of being F'n awesome
|
Vickery straight to the tribunal, not sure why. It seems to fit perfectly within the different gradings the MRP has, they again show they don't have the balls to rate contentious decisions |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · This Round, Injuries & Teams · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
12:30 AM Jul 12
|






12:30 AM Jul 12