| Welcome to Squees Lair. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Divisional Placement: What's your opinion? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 25 2014, 12:32 AM (703 Views) | |
| Aurange | Aug 25 2014, 12:32 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Team Jinchūriki Captain/Naruto League Owner/Dragon Ball Warriors Coach
|
Alright everyone, so there has been an issue that has come to my attention lately. It's about the way that divisional placement is to be decided from season to season. Originally, I posted in the Playoff Structure thread that it would be conducted based on what places teams were in their respective divisions, and at the end of the main season, depending on what spot they were in, they would be put in a different division next season. 1st spot teams went to Kage Division, 2nd spot teams went to Jonin Division, 3rd spot teams went to Chunin Division, and 4th spot teams went to Genin Division. However, I have heard a request of changing it to the way DBZ League operates; being based on win/loss record. The four highest teams w/l wise go to Kage Division, the four second highest teams w/l wise go to Jonin Division, and so on. If you came to an impasse where there were more than four teams with the same record, you would then find out which teams among those have beaten whom, and calculate the respective division using that data. The reason this was brought to my attention was for the purpose of power scaling. The concern was that with the current method, divisions would be way out of whack when it came to power differences and thus keeping certain teams at the top of their divisions repeatedly. Now, there is no guarantee this will happen, but it is a possibility. So, I'm going to let the community decide. My question to you is that since the main season is not over and done with yet, which method would you choose? I'll leave a poll up for you guys to vote on. You all have until Week 15's recording date (August 31st) to vote. Once we get to that date, it is to be decided. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| WickedPhantom | Aug 30 2014, 06:47 PM Post #21 |
![]()
|
Hey ima throw this out there i like both ideas but W/L is a better option for reasons Squee said. But squee say that team that was 5-10 wins the bowl then they deserve kage despite their record So i say W/L records with the exception of the Village Bowl Champion, who i think should be guaranteed Kage whether their record be 15-0 or 5-10 if they come out on top they deserve to stay on top despite everything Ex. Say Kurenai takes the bowl this season but has a record of 7-8 statistically that puts them Top of Chunin/Bottom of Jonin, but their the champions and your putting them in with teams like Taka or Kenjutsu who were average at best, so i think to be fair Champions should always be #1 seat of Kage/North Kai. |
![]() |
|
| Aurange | Sep 1 2014, 12:42 AM Post #22 |
![]()
Team Jinchūriki Captain/Naruto League Owner/Dragon Ball Warriors Coach
|
That's an interesting prospect, but you have to consider that the Playoffs are to be conducted differently from the main season matches. Either way, it's decided; the votes show that the majority of you would prefer... by Win/Loss record! |
![]() |
|
| BiggNateTGN | Sep 3 2014, 03:36 PM Post #23 |
![]()
Captain Team Sage
|
It would be different if the divisional matches were weighted more than all the open random matches. So a bracketed system works best based on w/l records and ties go to the best in their division after head to head records. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Naruto Announcements · Next Topic » |








7:56 PM Jul 10