| Welcome to Squees Lair. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Eating in the Britainlands.; What? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 23 2012, 01:36 PM (6,945 Views) | |
| RandomMan1 | Mar 30 2012, 11:12 AM Post #211 |
![]()
|
I actually thought 1 big country would be neat. It would require more compromise, instead of just create dream nations and then nuking each other off the face of the world. Plus, it would be hilarious to see what we manage to create. We could have individual ministers who decide what happens, then a president who negotiates compromises among the ministers. Either way, I'll take part, it will be a nice break from the DnD/RPs.
Edited by RandomMan1, Mar 30 2012, 11:16 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Grey | Mar 30 2012, 11:14 AM Post #212 |
![]()
|
Maybe have one thread to put an oversized description of our countries, and a UN type thread for the RP'z'ing. There can be only so many mega-nerds here Should this be in the current time period or, say, 15hundreds?
|
![]() |
|
| Grey | Mar 30 2012, 11:15 AM Post #213 |
![]()
|
I say we do both. |
![]() |
|
| RandomMan1 | Mar 30 2012, 11:16 AM Post #214 |
![]()
|
I'd go modern and avoid any accidental seryotypes |
![]() |
|
| Dantos4 | Mar 30 2012, 11:17 AM Post #215 |
![]()
|
Doing both does seem to be the best bet. Maybe we should do one country for now in one thread, then eventually test it out with ministers and an RP scenario? Then when we've got it in an okay state, we should be able to draw a few more mega-nerds into creating their own countries. Then we have a multi-country RP on our hands ![]() EDIT: I vote for modern too. It's the one we can mostly relate to real life. I would like to do medieval times, but there are too many "dark areas" (excuse the pun). Plus it is far more international if we have technology/internet involved, especially when there are more countries involved Edited by Dantos4, Mar 30 2012, 11:20 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Grey | Mar 30 2012, 11:19 AM Post #216 |
![]()
|
In the 15hundreds all there was as far as country stereotypes where "Lets try and work AROUND the pope and take over the world." "Lets be protestant and take over the world." and "Let's be catholic and kill all the protestants.".
Edited by Grey, Mar 30 2012, 11:20 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| RandomMan1 | Mar 30 2012, 11:21 AM Post #217 |
![]()
|
Post the idea in the Ideas thread in the RP section, you'll get plenty of the RP people. This idea also attracts people with strong political views, so, we shouldn't have problems with attracting intrest. |
![]() |
|
| Grey | Mar 30 2012, 11:22 AM Post #218 |
![]()
|
We need a WM first. Someone who knows a lot about modern politics and such. Not me. |
![]() |
|
| hjk561 | Mar 30 2012, 11:25 AM Post #219 |
|
He rules
|
MEMEMEMEMEME
|
![]() |
|
| Dantos4 | Mar 30 2012, 11:25 AM Post #220 |
![]()
|
Haha, definitely not me! So we are doing one country first then? Squeetopia? ![]() HJK, if you don't mind the torture of being the WM, then I have no problems with you being WM Edited by Dantos4, Mar 30 2012, 11:26 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |






3:21 AM Jul 11