| Welcome to Squees Lair. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| I don't like Skyrim; Now I've done it... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 7 2012, 11:10 PM (3,107 Views) | |
| Squee913 | Dec 10 2012, 06:19 PM Post #51 |
|
Yes, but everyone here pretty much agrees this sucks. I don't think anyone disputes that the dialog options in Skyrim were not a problem. I simply feel it is not big enough to outweigh all the things they did right since you still have every right to refuse to do it. if you don't want to do the quest, just don't. the only problem then is an entry in your journal. Annoying, yes, but not game breaking. Edited by Squee913, Dec 10 2012, 06:22 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| PvtCryan502 | Dec 10 2012, 06:31 PM Post #52 |
![]()
More than Just a Conjurer of Cheap Tricks
|
Quests: I know that 99% they all go down to the ideal of protect npc caravan or collect this, clear this. I don't want this base idea I want something differnet like collect 15 gold bars so your tavern that you bought could have better decorations or defend the lawyer to get to his case so he can defend an orphanage or defeat laws of greedy normals. Come out of left field. Suprise me not bland straight down the middle get here get currency. Or get 5 pieces of paper. No lie, I liked the Bards College quest. Leveling: Okay I meant grunt on grunt mano e mano(probably wrong) not mano e giant freaking beast that's the size of a McDonalds and at lunch rush probably just as heavy. Those big things are supposed to be hard. But I don't want to waltz into a bunch of thieves and not have to worry about my backside being stabbed. Exploration: Okay 5 yrs. in the making they're not supposed to be the same I would expect them to be maybe more like 1 out of 5 supprisingly tmple like places of a cult of vampires that connects you to a conspiracy then end it right there plus I noticed the one about the wolf deadra and the necromancers that was cool, 45 bandit hidey holes not cool. Weapons: Okay maybe I meant like you got a sword that is slightly better but I want maybe one sword that has that new flavor then just looking for those unique weapons like how Borderlands 2 gives you some pretty neat rankings of loot like maybe a purple amongst green's or in skyrim's a ork amongst that usual steel. I don't want to kill myself for something that is limeted with the unique weapons that are different in skyrim I want to have a chance for that (reference) pikachu amongst bug pokemon that's slim but still there. Edited by PvtCryan502, Dec 10 2012, 06:38 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| TheEdnar | Dec 10 2012, 06:54 PM Post #53 |
|
Ok, I feel like I've been whining a bit too much on the bad points of Skyrim. As I said in my first post I don't think it's a bad game, I can certainly see why some folks like it. For me the bad bits made it feel far too "meh" to have me play it for extended periods of time, but in the time I did spend with it I found several well done parts, such as: 1) Visuals, both the large, awe inspiring ones and the small inconsequential ones were done well. I'm not talking just like graphics quality but consistency. Things fit together and very, _very_ few things feel at all out of place. Which is quite an achievement if you think about it. The world is huge, and everything feels like it belongs. Architecture is fitting and interesting, nature beautiful, sometimes even breathtakingly so, and the fauna just feels right for the environment. 2) The customization options. The way skills were managed as well as the amount of gear and visual options for your character itself you're pretty much free to make exactly the person you want to. I loved the fact that playing a mageling, soldierly type, sneakthief, ranger, berserker, whatever character stereotype you wanted you could create and it would function, and you'd be able to beat the game with it. They had to have spent a good deal of time balancing that so the game didn't feel too tough for those who just breeze through the main quest as quickly as possible, nor quite a cakewalk (at least for a little while) for those who try to 100% the game. 3) The amount of fluff text. Since morrowind the series has had an insane amount of books, letters etc scattered all around the world that don't serve a purpose as such, but work as a great way to help immersion into the gameworld. History books, childrens stories, love letters, a shopping list left on the cupboard. Love the small touches that make the world feel that little bit more real. So yea, the game got many things right. The parts it got wrong however were, unfortunately, the ones that tend to matter the most for me. |
![]() |
|
| PvtCryan502 | Dec 10 2012, 07:28 PM Post #54 |
![]()
More than Just a Conjurer of Cheap Tricks
|
I kinda agree with the whining, but here Graphics: Awesome Fluff text: Amazing on how much they put on. Customization: They made you say we will not give you presets, but they say make your own guy whether single multiclass, furry or Breton you can do that except multiracial.(Disclaimer: I love the other species elves, orks, khajits, lizards, etc.) |
![]() |
|
| Vosoros | Dec 11 2012, 10:16 AM Post #55 |
|
I come up with a brilliant, cunning plan for those who don't like Skyrim...so cunning you'll think a weasel up your trousers. Ready? STOP buggering well playing it! See, utterly cunning and brilliant...it's almost like a consulted Baldrick for that plan!
|
![]() |
|
| Squee913 | Dec 11 2012, 11:17 AM Post #56 |
|
that is not helpful, nor is it contributing anything to the thread. Beyond that, many people could consider that insulting. Piph started this thread to try and gain perspective. What you just said is the equivalent of telling him to take his ball and go home. To be clear, I am not trying to sound harsh or suggest you can't pop in and say something funny or lighthearted, nor do I think you had any intent to do anything but make people laugh. I simply want you to be more careful that you don't end up stepping on someone's toes
Edited by Squee913, Dec 11 2012, 01:51 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Piph0 | Dec 12 2012, 02:07 AM Post #57 |
|
Milkman
|
To Squee,
(Takes deep breath and holds up a finger)
Oh.
I guess so, though I feel like I'm even handed. I would hope I could see where roleplaying would shine. You would have to ask but I think I could tell you if a game that I played helped with the roleplaying element.
I see your point.
I think this argument is a bit to... let's just say you're 'metagaming' with your roleplay. A "what if" scenario with this exact game. If the game didn't have smithing>weapons of legend, I don't think that would be a sought out goal and before you say it, yes, it could happen.
I actually have a solution; make Unique Equipment base stats the same as Daedric (Weapons and Heavy Armor) and Dragonbone (light armor) equipment and make sure there is a full set of Unique Armor or have the armor piece be interchangeable with a piece of the Daedric or Dragonbone set (for the set bonus perk not make all Unique armors pointless). Then you just slap on unique effects (like they did) to all of them. Ok, here's where smithing comes in. With Smithing you can make items, but where it really shines is its reinforcing (upgrade doesn't sound as cool ) . See -- you can get Daedric and Drgonbone stuff without smithing (more so with the Daedric part), but reinforcing is why smithing is so good. Here is the problem in the game's reinforcement system, you can reinforce Unique stuff, but the reinforcement of said stuff would not count any of your perks that help reinforcing. If these two thing was implemented, the same stats and fixed reinforcing people can then decide on "Should I stick with the Unique weapon or Enchant something more for me?" I should also note not all unique items should be like this. There should be lesser Unique items around as well.
Oh, that was a question for... sorry to interrupt.
I feel silly for saying this so much in this thread but -- Unique items are rewards and should feel like them.
I know this is a personal thing. I always wondered the opposite. Why can you make weapons easily better than the weapons from Deities?
In your words, why not? To be fair, I'll argue both sides. First, why not: Well I've done both. My play style is very much akin to a treasure hunter, since I explored so much and my goal was to find neat stuff... and I'm a hoarder. Now, your side, if you wanted to tell a classic tale of the next Lara Croft, you wouldn't find her tinkering around with ingots. Then again you could always name her Lara Craft.
Hey, I like collectibles too. They do have a story behind them and a neat name and look. I'm not taking that away from them; I just -- don't like them as a reward.
I'm saying the game is flawed at its base. As I said before, Smithing can make items, but is not needed to have them. Smithing’s real use is reinforcing. Removing Smithing only removes reinforcing, which wouldn't be a problem in the first place if the Unique Equipment was coded to accept Smithing perks. I'll just stop now. I just noticed I was repeating my solution thing.
That's me.
So you are ignoring the problem... K.
But you said, oh, never mind, you just said not "It was made for roleplaying."
Look, the only thing I care about is the reward system. If the weapons suck but gave a 1% more damage with daggers when found, great! I feel like my character got rewarded. My character doesn't feel better when getting those items. Well, it does give +5 to swag.
You keep talking about other people’s gameplay style and taste. Then basically told me to change mine...
Though only one part of my argument, it is optional. Everything else in the game is 100% optional too.
Hahaha! Sorry, this sounds like he's saying "Yes, yes, I know, I know." -- was thinking "It's like he knows what I'm going to say!"
But you were just... then why -- Why argue if you don't know what I’m saying?
Yeah, me too.
Well do! Blanket statement: Unless I say otherwise, the base Damage/Armor Value is less than the top competitor of its respective class (Two handed Hammer, One Headed Sword). Also, most of these Unique Equipment have a unique affect. And another thing, you can have two Enchantments on anything that can be enchanted.Azura's Star or The Black Star- This is one of the only thing that I can say hands down is better than it common counterpart. PS I also liked the quest for this one. Dawnbreaker- Ok, it does not cast soul trap. The chance explosion for undead sounds cool, but not useful in about 80% of the scenarios in the game. Ebony Blade- I haven't toyed around with this one because of what you need to do to upgrade it and I'm not a two-hander, but I do know the Ebony Blade cannot be reinforced. (I'm not sure if we are doing the whole reinforcement thing or not) Ebony Mail- Unique armor can be out classed easily. Not only can they be out enchanted and out smithed but they are not part of a set and will stifle anyone who went who put points into that perk for either light or heavy armor. Mace of Molag Bal- This one does out do the base damage the common one handed mace. With smithing done to both Unique and common, the common item still wins out. Masque of Clavicus Vile- Unique armor can be out -- you know the drill. It's price enchantment is useful. I don't want to get in to the usefulness of buying and selling. Mehrunes' Razor- I'll have to disagree with you and give you this one, if you're going dual welding this is a sick nasty weapon. Oghma Infinium- I agree. The book increases skills by a lot but I didn't use it. Ring of Namira- You can make better. Sanguine Rose- Oh yeah, staffs! I forgot about those. Well, there are no stats to compare it to... Good effect though. Spellbreaker- Though it has a better Base Armor stat then it common counterpart, Smithing strikes again! Also, its magic ward can be out classed by Magic Resistance by not needing to block to use it. Volendrung- Not much to say about this one. Yeah I don't know either, I can go check but the system is -- hard to pin down. Wabbajack- What about those people who don't want big bad monsters turning into little bunnies?
2 to 4 in my book. 1 if you're looking for an overall useful item.
I can't name the miscellaneous ones since I can't remember their names, but the Thieves Guild and Companions both suffer from these problems.
I thought the game did a good job of explaining what happened. If she dies the quest does end... just not in the whole bomb thing. And if you want impact it give you impact... the bobble head is dead!
Oh, don't worry. It's just obvious glitched ones like you have the book a man wants but he won't take it because you got it before he asked for it..
Better usage of flags.
I agree.
There's... Oh, never mind.
Why can't there be both? If there is a prize at the end, what does that take away from you.
You have a point. I don't see the game in the same way, but that...
OH YEAH! WELL, SAME TO YOU, BUDDY! (pouty-face)
I cannot think of any reason why I should not like the game by the premise and genre alone. It should have been one of my favorite games. I sit here, moved to god-damn tears, just thinking about what could have been. Like, Fallout 3 is my favorite game. I don't know if am going to get 4 because of this game. Edited by Piph0, Dec 12 2012, 02:08 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| infernocanuck | Dec 12 2012, 06:30 AM Post #58 |
|
If I may add a little constructive criticism, I think it might be best not to treat the quoting-then-replying thing as a conversation. Reading a bunch of text just to read, "Oh, nevermind" at the end isn't the most... efficient way to debate on a forum. I would suggest just taking some sections that you really want to address, quote them, and then offer a succinct counter-argument. That is a more appealing way to read a post, rather then a huge wall of blue and white text. As with all constructive criticisms, take this with a grain of sand. |
![]() |
|
| ClassicGamer102 | Dec 12 2012, 04:18 PM Post #59 |
|
What do you mean you might not buy 4 because of Skyrrim? I don't think that the games would have anything to do with each other. A lot of people say that Fallout is Elder Scrolls with guns when it simply isn't! Honestly I don't think that when they make 4 that Skyrim will be thought about. If they did make the game more similar to Skyrim, say change the way you level up, I would be really disappointed. When I roleplay in Fallout I'm able to think about what my character has done and level up his skills based on what I thought he would have improved in. |
![]() |
|
| PvtCryan502 | Dec 12 2012, 04:51 PM Post #60 |
![]()
More than Just a Conjurer of Cheap Tricks
|
I would but see there's something called TIME. Which is very little due to work and Skyrim requires ENORMOUS COSMIC TIME and the problem is itty bitty playing space |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Debate Section · Next Topic » |




I would hope I could see where roleplaying would shine. You would have to ask but I think I could tell you if a game that I played helped with the roleplaying element.
) . See -- you can get Daedric and Drgonbone stuff without smithing (more so with the Daedric part), but reinforcing is why smithing is so good. Here is the problem in the game's reinforcement system, you can reinforce Unique stuff, but the reinforcement of said stuff would not count any of your perks that help reinforcing. If these two thing was implemented, the same stats and fixed reinforcing people can then decide on "Should I stick with the Unique weapon or Enchant something more for me?" I should also note not all unique items should be like this. There should be lesser Unique items around as well.
-- was thinking "It's like he knows what I'm going to say!"
Why argue if you don't know what I’m saying?

1:56 PM Jul 11