Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome back to The Border!
Quick Links Announcements
| Home | Member's Blogs |

| Enter Chat Room |

| Today's active topics |


You can also see and join us at:

TPB's YouTube Channel ~ Click to Register
The Vampire Lair on Facebook
and
MonsterVisionTV on Facebook

TPB's Quote of the Day!

We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Montana fires a warning shot over states’ rights
Topic Started: Apr 29 2009, 09:21 PM (120 Views)
XNavyGunner
Member Avatar
Gunner

Montana is trying to trigger a battle over gun control — and perhaps make a larger point about what many folks in this ruggedly independent state regard as a meddlesome federal government.

In a bill passed by the Legislature earlier this month, the state is asserting that guns manufactured in Montana and sold in Montana to people who intend to keep their weapons in Montana are exempt from federal gun registration, background check and dealer-licensing rules because no state lines are crossed.

That notion is all but certain to be tested in court.

The immediate effect of the law could be limited, since Montana is home to just a few specialty gun makers, known for high-end hunting rifles and replicas of Old West weapons, and because their out-of-state sales would automatically trigger federal control.

Legal showdown
Still, much bigger prey lies in Montana's sights: a legal showdown over how far the federal government's regulatory authority extends.

"It's a gun bill, but it's another way of demonstrating the sovereignty of the state of Montana," said Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who signed the bill.

Carrie DiPirro, a spokeswoman for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, had no comment on the legislation. But the federal government has generally argued that it has authority under the interstate commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution to regulate guns because they can so easily be transported across state lines.

Guns and states' rights both play well in Montana, the birthplace of the right-wing Freemen militia and a participant in the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 1970s and '80s, during which Western states clashed with Washington over grazing and mineral extraction on federal land.

Montana's leading gun rights organization, more hardcore than the National Rifle Association, boasts it has moved 50 bills through the Legislature over the past 25 years. And lawmakers in the Big Sky State have rebelled against federal control of everything from wetland protection to the national Real ID system.

'Made in Montana'
Under the new law, guns intended only for Montana would be stamped "Made in Montana." The drafters of the law hope to set off a legal battle with a simple Montana-made youth-model single-shot, bolt-action .22 rifle. They plan to find a "squeaky clean" Montanan who wants to send a note to the ATF threatening to build and sell about 20 such rifles without federal dealership licensing.

If the ATF tells them it's illegal, they will sue and take the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, if they can.

Similar measures have also been introduced in Texas and Alaska.

"I think states have got to stand up or else most of their rights are going to be buffaloed by the administration and by Congress," said Texas state Rep. Leo Berman.

Critics say exempting guns from federal laws anywhere would undermine efforts to stem gun violence everywhere.

"Guns cross state lines and they do so constantly, and this is a Sagebrush Rebellion-type effort to light some sort of fire and get something going that's pleasing to the gun nuts and that has very little actual sense," said Peter Hamm, communications director for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

'It's about state rights'
In a 2005 case, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the enforcement of federal laws against marijuana in California, even if the drug is for medical purposes and is grown and used within the state. The court found that since marijuana produced in California is essentially indistinguishable from pot grown outside the state, the federal government must have the authority to regulate both to enforce national drug laws.

Randy Barnett, the lawyer and constitutional scholar who represented the plaintiff in the California case, said that Montana could argue that its "Made in Montana"-stamped guns are unique and sufficiently segregated as to lie outside federal regulation.

Supporters of the measure say the main purpose is not extending gun freedoms, but curbing what they regard as an oppressive interpretation of the interstate commerce clause and federal overreach into such things as livestock management and education.

"Firearms are inextricably linked to the history and culture of Montana, and I'd like to support that," said Montana state Rep. Joel Boniek, the bill's sponsor. "But I want to point out that the issue here is not about firearms. It's about state rights."

Source

Sounds like the place for me to live. :biggrin:
Edited by XNavyGunner, Apr 29 2009, 09:30 PM.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hunter207
Member Avatar
Boss
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
hell yea... all we need now is this bill to be passed here in NM
You can take your heaven, when I die I sooner go to Middle Earth..

- George R.R. Martin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgcoBKWTW14
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
XNavyGunner
Member Avatar
Gunner

And in Colorado.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
StrmySummer
Member Avatar
Storm Goddess

and NC

i had heard that Montana has something set up in their state constitution or something that if the government tried to say they can't have guns then they can separate themselves from the US and become independant......
Posted Image

"Beginning now, let's play more, kiss more, love more, let's be so close that when one of us cries, the other tastes salt."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Max
Member Avatar
Pickle barrel, pickle barrel, Kumquat!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I like this kind of thinking. In my personal opinion,lots of Federal regs need to be abolished-especially "gun control". You know,if the Far-Left interpreted the 2nd Amendment as broadly as they do # 1-10 then we all would be REQUIRED to own NATO-standard automatic rifles for "the Militia"!
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Isis
Member Avatar
The Goddess of Darkness & Desire

I'm with SS on this one we need this in NC..... :reading:
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image
Isis, The Goddess of Desire & Darkness. In The Darkness, We Find The Light.

This is a Drama Free Zone..!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hunter207
Member Avatar
Boss
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I'd like to point out something my friend once told me... a guy, if he really wants a gun, is gonna get it, regs or not... its the regular people who will suffer... I wouldnt see a guy robbing a house if he knew they carried a weapon...

Oh, and SS, they have the same thing in Texas... kinda funny I think
You can take your heaven, when I die I sooner go to Middle Earth..

- George R.R. Martin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgcoBKWTW14
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
XNavyGunner
Member Avatar
Gunner

Hunter, you hit the nail on the head. Criminals are cowards and won't go after someone they know can fight back. And that's why the Gunner family keeps an armed home.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · News Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Web Hosting Reviews
Web Hosting Reviews
Skin Created by Xarina of Rapture & Zathyus Networks Resources.
This theme is best viewed in firefox.