![]() | ||
| Quick Links | Announcements | | Enter Chat Room | | Today's active topics | Follow @paranormalborde |
TPB's YouTube Channel ~ Click to Register The Vampire Lair on Facebook and MonsterVisionTV on Facebook |
|
|
|
||
| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| 'Monolith' Object on Mars? You Could Call It That | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 13 2012, 06:19 AM (419 Views) | |
| Max | Apr 13 2012, 06:19 AM Post #1 |
|
Pickle barrel, pickle barrel, Kumquat!
|
Amateur stargazers have discovered an intriguing object jutting out from the surface of Mars. The seemingly perfectly rectangular, upright structure, found in NASA images of the Red Planet, bears a striking resemblance to the monoliths planted on Earth and the moon by aliens in the classic sci-fi film "2001: A Space Odyssey." The object in question was first spotted several years ago after being photographed by the HiRISE camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, a NASA space probe; every so often, it garners renewed interest on the Internet. But is it unnatural — a beacon erected by aliens for mysterious reasons, and even more mysteriously paralleled in the imaginations of Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, creators of "2001"? Or is this rock the work of nature? According to Jonathon Hill, a research technician and mission planner at the Mars Space Flight Facility at Arizona State University, who processes many of the images taken during NASA's Mars missions, the object in question is no more than a roughly rectangular boulder. The HiRISE camera that photographed it has a resolution of approximately 1 foot (30 centimeters) per pixel — impressive considering the 180-mile (300-kilometer) altitude from which it photographs the Martian surface, but not quite sharp enough to capture the cragginess of a mid-size boulder. "When your resolution is too low to fully resolve an object, it tends to look rectangular because the pixels in the image are squares. Any curve will look like a series of straight lines if you reduce your resolution enough," Hill told Life's Little Mysteries. The location of the boulder at the bottom of a cliff near many other boulders suggests it broke off the cliff and tumbled to its current spot sometime in the distant past, Hill said. Such a perilous location is itself an argument against deliberate placement by aliens: "If I was going to build a monolith somewhere, that's the last place I would put it!" he said. "The debris falling from the cliff would cover it up pretty quickly, on geologic timescales." Hill added that the height of the boulder is being exaggerated in the photo by a low sun angle. Photographed when the sun was near the horizon, the boulder casts an especially long shadow. The ufologists aren't necessarily wrong in calling it a monolith — the word simply translates from Latin as "one stone." But this monolith isn't the masonry of Martians. SOURCE:YahooNews There sure are a lot of weird objects on Mars that are "explained" by camera resolution problems. |
| |
|
|
|
| LarryOldtimer | Apr 13 2012, 12:24 PM Post #2 |
|
The Man!!!
|
Long rectangular shapes simply don't happen in nature, nor do rectangular boulders. This guy should get out of his office more, and hike and see for himself. |
|
|
|
| Isis | Apr 19 2012, 12:39 PM Post #3 |
|
The Goddess of Darkness & Desire
![]()
|
There could be a little green man waving at the camera and they would swear it was a trick of light playing of solar gas or something insane like that....
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Isis, The Goddess of Desire & Darkness. In The Darkness, We Find The Light. This is a Drama Free Zone..! | |
|
|
|
| Max | Apr 20 2012, 07:07 AM Post #4 |
|
Pickle barrel, pickle barrel, Kumquat!
|
Agreed, Tara. If every piece of evidence is dismissed as a "trick of the light" or "camera artifact error", then we really can't trust NASA at all. |
| |
|
|
|
| LarryOldtimer | Apr 20 2012, 09:07 AM Post #5 |
|
The Man!!!
|
NACA has been posting much higher resolution images for some time now. These images are about astounding. http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/releases/sept_09.php?page=2 |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Space and Technology · Next Topic » |









2:22 AM Jul 11