Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to In The Box. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Jose
Topic Started: Jan 13 2008, 10:58 PM (144 Views)
El Nino
Unregistered

Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .
Quote Post Goto Top
 
El Nino
Unregistered

anways the inital topic was about the possiblity about jose joining liverpool not going thru the same old stuff about roman and his money .
Quote Post Goto Top
 
definitelynotmowipromise
Unregistered

El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?
Quote Post Goto Top
 
El Nino
Unregistered

definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?
Quote Post Goto Top
 
definitelynotmowipromise
Unregistered

El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
El Nino
Unregistered

definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?
Quote Post Goto Top
 
definitelynotmowipromise
Unregistered

El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

I'll give you Mikel.

But unless you can prove the Robben, SWP and Ballack ones on anything other than hearsay from the press, then you're talking balls.

Still didn't address my argument either.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
El Nino
Unregistered

definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:13 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

I'll give you Mikel.

But unless you can prove the Robben, SWP and Ballack ones on anything other than hearsay from the press, then you're talking balls.

Still didn't address my argument either.

which argument is that ?
Quote Post Goto Top
 
definitelynotmowipromise
Unregistered

El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:15 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:13 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

I'll give you Mikel.

But unless you can prove the Robben, SWP and Ballack ones on anything other than hearsay from the press, then you're talking balls.

Still didn't address my argument either.

which argument is that ?

Enough!

I can't be arsed with you. It's like arguing with a fucking parrot.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
El Nino
Unregistered

definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:16 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:15 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:13 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

I'll give you Mikel.

But unless you can prove the Robben, SWP and Ballack ones on anything other than hearsay from the press, then you're talking balls.

Still didn't address my argument either.

which argument is that ?

Enough!

I can't be arsed with you. It's like arguing with a fucking parrot.

well which argument you on about ?


oh well
anyway back on topic before it was changed

Quote Post Goto Top
 
definitelynotmowipromise
Unregistered

El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:18 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:16 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:15 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:13 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

I'll give you Mikel.

But unless you can prove the Robben, SWP and Ballack ones on anything other than hearsay from the press, then you're talking balls.

Still didn't address my argument either.

which argument is that ?

Enough!

I can't be arsed with you. It's like arguing with a fucking parrot.

well which argument you on about ?


oh well
anyway back on topic before it was changed

BY YOU!!!!

Oh my god.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gerrard You Diver Son
Member Avatar
London Pride
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

Well I never even read about the last two. There must have been 10 clubs looking or talking to Ballack, when a player of his stature comes on the market in normally happens. Terms were agreed and he joined us.

As for Mikel there was a long standing case involving that which I won't go into as it's been done to death, & as for Robben, PSV told Utd to do one when they offered £5 million less than originally agreed confirmed in fact by PSV's president.
We stepped in and met their price and took the player. Same as any other transfer business involving ANY club.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
El Nino
Unregistered

Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 01:20 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:06 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 02:04 PM
definitelynotmowipromise
Jan 14 2008, 01:01 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:51 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:42 PM
El Nino
Jan 14 2008, 01:32 PM
Gerrard You Diver Son
Jan 14 2008, 12:21 PM
Talking of extremes Phil, £8.5 million on Collymore? Defened that if you can!

and in the two seasons he was with us formed the highest scoring parnership in th prem at the time with fowler . prob scored morein a couple of matches than sheva has all season . 28 goals in 60 games .as opposed to 8 in 41 ?

who has mentioned destroying football ?

how has roman made the prem better ? by buying all the players to stop other teams getting them ?

Oh I'm sorry I thought we were talking about transfer fees. not what they have done since signing. That was the point of the discussion.

How did Roman make the prem better? By changing the league from the usual Arsenal-Man Utd monolpoly into a three horse race whilst also revitalising a heavily stagnated transfer market & then that money filters through to other clubs.

Where did West Ham, Southampton, Blackburn & Charlton spend the money we gave them for Cole, Johnson, Bridge, Duff & Parker? Most of it went to other English/British clubs

Many clubs benefited from the cash injection and further down the chain I am sure it did some clubs a huge favour.

you ask me to defend the transfer of colleymore o i have done ,im pretty sure that is the only time we have broken the transfer record in uk .there is two sides to it yes the clubs get money but loose their best players - where are charlton southampton now ? also west ham nearly went down - money is everything . clubs now have to pay over the odds for players to compete against yourself in the transfer market , is that good for the clubs ? also most of the big transfers have come from abroad - crepo,essien,robben,sheva,cech,drogba,carvahlo so the money isnt going to clubs in this country . yes i know its the selling clubs fault for raising the prices . before roman came along the transfer market was fine and everyone competeed now you have to pay big bucks , way over what the player is worth .

The transfer market was dead...Man United would make the occasional huge signing but apart from that, fuck all.

Remember all the talk of the football bubble bursting? Remember ITV Digital going down? Not saying that Abramovich has himself fixed all of this but he has gone a long way towards doing so.

Before Abramovich, it was United (mainly) and occasionally Arsenal. Roman coming in has meant that everyone has had to up their game and it means that there are now three genuine contenders to the title with Liverpool surely to amount some sort of challenge in the near future. How is that bad for the game?

ITV digital was to do with the championship not the prem , same with the bubble bursting , the money in the prem has always been there . there is two sides to the coin , yes the fees have gone up meaning other clubs get more money but now because of inflated fees other clubs cant spend that manoey on the top players due to the fact chelsea can outbid anyone they want and ensure the player they want goes to them instead of others due to higher wages also . so is that good for football ?

What are you talking about? "Coz u hav lots of monee u can outbid ova clubz 4 playerz".

That is such a simple view of how the transfer market works! We buy players that we want. When have we ever been in a bidding war and just said "ok we'll double what you want"? I didn't see us bidding a stupid amount for Hargreaves or Carrick or Torres.

If you're going to resort to such a basic uninformed argument, then there really is no point.

mikel ? robben was on his way to man utd? , swp on his way to arsenal ?ballack joining man utd ?

Well I never even read about the last two. There must have been 10 clubs looking or talking to Ballack, when a player of his stature comes on the market in normally happens. Terms were agreed and he joined us.

As for Mikel there was a long standing case involving that which I won't go into as it's been done to death, & as for Robben, PSV told Utd to do one when they offered £5 million less than originally agreed confirmed in fact by PSV's president.
We stepped in and met their price and took the player. Same as any other transfer business involving ANY club.

thats cool mate , just go by what is read in the papers .
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stam Manchester United
No Avatar
International
Blinkered Red
Jan 14 2008, 09:48 AM
be a test for him to really manager a club rather than just play at it

best of a bad bunch i spose but i dont really think maureen has the stickability factor that we need

Porto "thumb"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Liverpool · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2


         

Latest BBC News
« »