| Welcome to Altezza Club Of NZ/Australia. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. http://s4.zetaboards.com/lexusaltezzaclub/topic/1148393/1/#new |
| Fuel Economy; how do we improve it? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 26 2004, 10:47 AM (16,608 Views) | |
| chucker | Oct 26 2004, 10:47 AM Post #1 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I was wondering.. wot should we use for best performance and economy.. wots the recommended for Altezza? 96 or 98 octane? I'm not concerned about the price.. only k's per ltr.. how do we improve it? well, I hope we should start with a stock standard engine.. |
![]() |
|
| FLEX | Oct 26 2004, 11:53 AM Post #2 |
|
Sleeper
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I used to use BP Ultimate (98 octane) and that was pretty dam good ! I used to always get around 620-640kms from a full tank easy. Ever since I had my engine flush, cleaned and service with all the filters replaced and all - I was advise to do a switch over to Shell Optimax ... I only get around 580kms now ... "Supposely" Shell is better ... try and use the one brand of fuel if possible ... with the price nowadays - up to $1.20 its crazy .... ! |
| |
![]() |
|
| Stephen | Oct 26 2004, 02:22 PM Post #3 |
|
Altezza Club of Australia
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Likewise, I only use Shell Optimax. |
| |
![]() |
|
| bmalar | Oct 26 2004, 03:21 PM Post #4 |
|
Location: Brisbane, AU
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I also only use only Optimax, but if i get desperate I'll use BP ultimate. |
|
Brisbane 2008 ISF & 2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600 K5 | |
![]() |
|
| Flyboy69 | Oct 26 2004, 05:36 PM Post #5 |
|
"Gold Club" Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Try running around with my Diff and see what sort of fuel usage you get. I wish I was getting 580km out of a tank. I proberly average about 480-500km. Over here 98 is about $1.28 at the moment |
| |
![]() |
|
| voiceinsideyou | Oct 26 2004, 07:23 PM Post #6 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Of course, comparing GXE10s to SXE10s will be useless - so it'd help if people made clear what they have! I'd be lucky to get 500kms from my SXE10 with intake only mods, but I'm happy enough :-p |
| 99 Altezza RS200Z: C-west front kit, xenon conve, HKS intake + Apexi heatshield, FGK/Fujitsubo exhaust, TRD front and rear sways, Cusco adjustble platform suspension | |
![]() |
|
| chucker | Oct 26 2004, 11:56 PM Post #7 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
oops.. my bad.. I think we should state that too.. as I read somewhere, recommended fuel for
I've got SXE-10 and it does about 9kms/ltr [avg urban].. its a '99 (model) and its a stock standard as far as I know ![]() so, I think the fuel economy is pretty bad for me.. actually, I've tried both 96 and 98 octane.. 98 is pretty much give you more performance for less k's.. (like high 8s a ltr) and 96 is pretty good with more k's (low - mid 9s a ltr).. |
![]() |
|
| RS200AT | Oct 27 2004, 08:10 PM Post #8 |
|
Lowered
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
GXE-10 have 10L larger tank capacity. I can get 10km/L in mt RS200, but 9-9.5 is more common. |
![]() |
|
| Twincams | Oct 28 2004, 05:21 AM Post #9 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
my RS200 is getting close to 11km/l... i personally noted that using 98 and below fetches worse mileage than the 'claimed 100' octane by Caltex(it's called Platinum grade here in singapore) which i am using now for good. |
| |
![]() |
|
| chucker | Oct 28 2004, 08:27 AM Post #10 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
we dont get 100 octane in NZ gas stations yet anyway, I think the main thing is that I've gotta reset my ECU. Then, I've gotta start using a single type of gas.. so, at least I can get 9.5kms per ltr..
|
![]() |
|
| Alee79 | Oct 28 2004, 02:50 PM Post #11 |
|
Location: Sydney, AU
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
100 octane? for real? i use vortex from caltex all the time,because petrol card from work cant complain :lol: |
![]() |
|
| chucker | Oct 28 2004, 03:58 PM Post #12 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
good for you man wots the consumption for your IS200? is it sports model? |
![]() |
|
| Alee79 | Oct 28 2004, 04:42 PM Post #13 |
|
Location: Sydney, AU
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
2000 IS200 Sport,70 litres tank,i cant remember whats the fuel consumption on it..maybe some of our expert here can tell us
|
![]() |
|
| Twincams | Oct 29 2004, 05:53 AM Post #14 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
well, it's 'claimed' and we don't have any hard facts to prove it... my apologies, it's specifically named the 'vortex platinum' here, and also the most expensive... $1.61 per litre
|
| |
![]() |
|
| arist | Oct 29 2004, 08:27 AM Post #15 |
|
Soccer Mom
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I was talking to the owner of Turbo Vehicles ( there was some evidence of detonation) some time ago he and his company are well known in high performance vehicle circles and after dynoing my car he mentioned that the only Fuel that they had tested in NZ that had any Guts was Mobil 8000 , the rest were rubbish! ( i have no shares in Mobil!). Ron |
![]() |
|
| SenDog | Mar 11 2005, 02:06 AM Post #16 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm getting some relatively shockingly bad fuel economy, but then again I haven't calculated it yet, will do so from now on to see if it's just my imagination. I drive it normally, with a squirt now and then, and it seems to be chewing up petrol at an alarming rate. Could be I'm expecting it to be a super fuel efficient 2 litre. Will find out soon .... Sport model, IS200. |
![]() |
|
| aidan | Mar 21 2005, 05:55 PM Post #17 |
|
Soccer Mom
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I find BP Ultimate 98 is fine, also have you fitted an aftermarket air filter system- such as an HKS, K&N etc (Repco ones are no good!) I wouldnt really know about non-turbo 3SGE fuel economy as i have a 3S-GTE turbo MR2, hope this helps. |
![]() |
|
| jasestu | Dec 8 2005, 05:31 PM Post #18 |
|
caffeinated...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've just put this post over on the UK forum to help up a poor Altezza owner who thinks NZ only has 91 and 96 octane fuel... Hopefully he can find his way here for futher enlightenment. ![]()
Edit: Maybe edwardch is already here? The original post on the UK forum was from back in June.... |
|
ex RS200 Z ed 6MT | Bay of Plenty, New Zealand | |
![]() |
|
| Nakamichi | Jan 23 2006, 03:03 PM Post #19 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
At the time I bought my car a few months back the Lexus website shown that the fuel type for IS200 to be 91RON. The questions are : 1 - Does it mean that the ECU of the IS200 is set for 91RON and the continuous use of regular unlead will not cause any damage to the engine ? 2 - If that's the case, will the use of 95 or 98 octanes improve the performance or mileage ? TIA |
![]() The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection | |
![]() |
|
| greeneyes | Feb 4 2006, 08:26 PM Post #20 |
|
Targa Master
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am quite sure using 91 will not damage the engine. The only difference the fuel rating makes is to the spark advance that the computer delivers. If the fuel is low octane then the engine will detonate under load, the knock sensor will tell the ECU and the ECU will retard the timing and stop the pinking. This will reduce the power output, particularly over 3000rpm So by upping the octane of the fuel you use you allow the engine to run more advance on the spark, and the engine revs better. If you're not using all that power or all those revs, it doesn't matter which octane you use. I use 96, occasionally 98 (especially trackday! :lol: ) and if petrol hits $2/litre next month then I'll mix 91 & 96!!!!!! |
|
The Girl's KE70- http://www.rollaclub.com/board/topic/42407-the-girls-ke70/ How NOT to build a rally car- http://www.rollaclub.com/board/topic/64027...ld-a-rally-car/ | |
![]() |
|
| Brian_J | Feb 4 2006, 09:55 PM Post #21 |
|
Sleeper
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
apparently the computer on our computers are "learning" ones, so best to stick with one grade of fuel. apparently 95 ron is the way to go for the GXE. in reality though, i really dont think it makes much of a differnece, i usually go with 95 ron at shell or caltex. recently i have gone bp ultimax of 98 ron and notice very marginal improvements (maybe its all in my head though) |
2001 IS200 6MT
| |
![]() |
|
| Nakamichi | Feb 7 2006, 09:14 AM Post #22 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've tried all three RON from Caltex but did not seem to find any different for rev up to 6000rpm as that's the most I went. I made very sure that each tank was filled up without much mix of the other, ie at least 67 litres of each RON was filled at a time. The feeling of 91RON seems to be more smoother & softer on the accelerator Try to tell the difference yourself by asking someone to randomly fill up one type of the RON next time, so don't try to guess it if you can not tell the difference
|
![]() The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection | |
![]() |
|
| SenDog | Feb 12 2006, 03:26 AM Post #23 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've tried regular as well as Optimax / 8000 / Ultimate and haven't noticed any difference. What I did notice was fuel economy improved markedly when revs are between 3000-4000 instead of 2500-3500 during normal driving. |
![]() |
|
| jasestu | Feb 13 2006, 05:55 AM Post #24 |
|
caffeinated...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Drive above 3000?! Sweet, that's all the excuse I need.. 5th gear on the open road... 6th and I'll have to go 130-140 to be economic? Gunna love explaining that to the enforcers...
|
|
ex RS200 Z ed 6MT | Bay of Plenty, New Zealand | |
![]() |
|
| SenDog | Feb 13 2006, 10:04 AM Post #25 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I believe it's more to do with the throttle position, light throttle on these un-torquey engines at a slightly higher rpm would be more fuel efficient than heavier throttle at a lower rpm. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Engines • Intakes • Exhausts · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)








8:28 PM Jul 11