| Welcome to Altezza Club Of NZ/Australia. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. http://s4.zetaboards.com/lexusaltezzaclub/topic/1148393/1/#new |
| Fuel Economy; how do we improve it? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 26 2004, 10:47 AM (16,613 Views) | |
| SSML | Feb 13 2006, 11:22 PM Post #26 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wah, Sendog: is ur theory is true, then I m gonna try on my next tank and see if it improves fuel economy... good piece of info!! thanks.. 3000~ 4000rpm!! |
|
02 IS200 Lux6MT BneAus 2008 addition: DIY job:DBA 4000series x-drilled rotors + bendix pads
| |
![]() |
|
| SenDog | Feb 13 2006, 11:30 PM Post #27 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, don't quote me on it, could just be me ![]() Try it out, light on the throttle, just hold it a bit longer, so that u don't have to go heavier on the throttle at a higher gear. |
![]() |
|
| Nakamichi | Feb 14 2006, 08:52 AM Post #28 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Any car doesn't matter what engine running above 3000rpm will take up more petrol. The best fuel efficient is between 2000 & 3000rpm. For instant, if you can sacrafice the speed by driving between 80 & 90km/h instead of 110km/h or more on motorway, you will save at least one litre per 100km
|
![]() The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection | |
![]() |
|
| SenDog | Feb 14 2006, 10:00 AM Post #29 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I partially disagree with you there ... It also depends on how the engine is being loaded at the time. What I was talking about above, was for example you were under acceleration and wanted to get from x speed to y speed in a certain period of time. To do so close towards the car's powerband would require less throttle, but to do so at a lower rpm in a higher gear, would need more throttle. This is especially true uphills. As I understand it, more throttle = more air, more air = more fuel. If you have an S-AFC you can check your airflow meter readings to confirm this. |
![]() |
|
| Nakamichi | Feb 14 2006, 11:01 AM Post #30 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If I get you right, you're talking about fuel efficient on acceleration from x speed to y speed in a certain period of time by controlling the throttle. If that's a short period in getting to, say 100km/h on high rpm will not be as fuel efficient as soft acceleration with a bit longer time to get up to 100km/h. It's easier to prove that with constant speed as I've mentioned above
|
![]() The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection | |
![]() |
|
| SenDog | Feb 14 2006, 11:25 AM Post #31 |
|
Custom
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah I get what you're saying, but even to maintain a constant speed, I believe sitting at about 3000-3500rpm is better, as it requires less throttle, than more throttle at 2000rpm to maintain the same speed. Could just be my car is weird, but I've definitely noticed better fuel economy :/ |
![]() |
|
| Brian_J | Feb 14 2006, 12:44 PM Post #32 |
|
Sleeper
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
sendog i think i know where you are coming from obviously cruising at 50 km/h in 6th gear will be inefficient and so on i also try to keep a "light" throttle on |
2001 IS200 6MT
| |
![]() |
|
| xjayx9 | Mar 1 2006, 01:39 PM Post #33 |
|
Soccer Mom
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I use BP Unleaded and have managed to get around the 10km/L mark. Company card so easy to obtain the data. See below Odometer Litres 74872 Litres 75349 51.33 477 10.76 75594 26.24 245 10.71 76043 46.48 449 10.35 76541 7.36 498 1.48 76650 46.05 109 42.25 77054 42.49 404 10.52 77492 44 438 10.05 77877 42.29 385 10.98 78291 42.32 414 10.22 Overall KM 3419 Overall Ltr 348.56 10.1947938 |
|
XJAYX 1999 RS200 | |
![]() |
|
| RESIST | Mar 1 2006, 09:14 PM Post #34 |
|
The new toy!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My RS200 around akl city usually did bout 450km to the tank or 8.6km/L and 650km on straight trip (open road). But to be honest I now get 13.5km/L around Akl city and that on 91Ron. (figure that one out) |
|
RESIST Bucklands Beach, AKL 021-480560 | |
![]() |
|
| Jase | Mar 1 2006, 10:43 PM Post #35 |
|
Auckland, NZ > Tsing Yi, HK
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i've been getting about 410Km with $50 of 95 thats about 35L of fuel? that gives me 11.7km/L I consider that not bad! Since I have an N1 type muffler and a HKS pod filter! 6 speed RS200 by the way |
| |
![]() |
|
| owned | Mar 2 2006, 07:14 PM Post #36 |
|
Soccer Mom
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
OMG how do u ppl do it?? i get approx 350km with $80 on BP 98 in my is300
|
![]() |
|
| jasestu | Mar 3 2006, 06:05 AM Post #37 |
|
caffeinated...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Earlier discussion on similar topic - here. I've run both 96 and 98 octane, but last time I analysed the data there was no statistically significant difference in economy between the two. And my graphs again: |
|
ex RS200 Z ed 6MT | Bay of Plenty, New Zealand | |
![]() |
|
| DataBitz | Apr 20 2006, 06:21 PM Post #38 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Here is my fuel economy, mine is a 1998 5AT I have been using 91 always except for an economy test I did open road driving around the North Island. I used 98 and got 11.93 km/l (8.38 L/100km) and on 91 got 11.75 (8.51 L/100km). 95% of my other driving is in heavy traffic from North Shore to Greenlane and back, the low fuel consumption patches are from open road driving. ![]() DATA Date L/100km km/L 16/12/2005 10.56 9.47 22/12/2005 11.24 8.90 31/12/2005 10.54 9.49 4/01/2006 9.82 10.18 7/01/2006 8.45 11.83 8/01/2006 8.38 11.93 19/01/2006 10.42 9.60 30/01/2006 11.12 8.99 12/02/2006 10.28 9.73 23/02/2006 11.19 8.94 1/03/2006 10.06 9.94 11/03/2006 11.18 8.94 25/03/2006 11.03 9.07 6/04/2006 11.21 8.92 14/04/2006 10.59 9.44 17/04/2006 8.51 11.75 19/04/2006 8.50 11.76 |
|
DataBitz / Peter 1998 Toyota Altezza RS200Z 5AT - Blue Toyota Front Lip::Boot Lip Spoiler::Toyo T1R Tyres | |
![]() |
|
| DataBitz | Jul 1 2006, 11:26 AM Post #39 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just a note for any RS200/3SGE owners who may have decided to run 91 after reading my post. Since experiencing occasional engine knocking (pinging), I have changed to higher octanes 95+, which don't cause knocking. I suspect because the 3SGE engines are running such high compression, even the knock sensor cannot compensate for the NZ low octane 91 fuel. |
|
DataBitz / Peter 1998 Toyota Altezza RS200Z 5AT - Blue Toyota Front Lip::Boot Lip Spoiler::Toyo T1R Tyres | |
![]() |
|
| Mos | Jul 5 2006, 12:57 AM Post #40 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(Sorry, didn't see this thread until after answering the IS300 one). IS200 slushbox sports luxury: Best case 8.75L/100km (calculated). Worst case 11L/100km (estimate). Difference in fuel consumption between standard unleaded and 98 is about 6%, with 10% extra cost is not economical. (Power also went down from 83rwkw to 78rwkw with different fuel but this may not be absolutely correct as other people lost power with no changes between the two runs 5 months apart). I haven't tried the 100ron stuff yet. In normal city driving it comfortably gives me 600km per tank (IE I don't get nervous until I'm on about 650km - needle well below empty). The most that's ever gone in the tank was 69.7L. If you're really low a sharp acceleration will result in fuel starvation giving you warning (don't try it on a turbo engine under high boost smile.gif). Fuel light, from memory, comes on with about 10L left. The only real way to tell how much fuel is left is to fill up as soon as the light comes on a see how much goes in. These tanks don't have a separate fuel light swith - the light comes off the sender itself, so it's possible the threshold will not always be the same. The cluster also smooths out the sender signal - it uses the speedo signal to work out when the car accelerates and disregards the sender reading until the vehicle speed stabilises. Mos. |
|
Admin, Founding Member, Toymods Car Club Inc. 2000 IS200 Sports Luxury 1UZ-FE VVTi 210rwkw Previous: 1991 MX83 Grande 2JZ-GTE 222rwkw, 1984 AE86 Sprinter 4A-GE | |
![]() |
|
| black200 | Jul 6 2006, 01:53 AM Post #41 |
![]()
in my own paradise
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Next time you're doing 60km/h use 6th gear, floor it - you can feel the injectors reaching maximum load and the motor noticably labours to gear the revs higher but she don't go. oh and watch you're instant fuel consumption cruise to 30L+/100km in my 6spd 1gfe i get 10L/100km at best. After a few big runs and a few luff days i've managed 13L/100km at absolute worst. Keeping in mind the 1g motor runs lean from the factory 10L/100km is pretty danm good consumption so it really isn't something to worry about. i used to see 20-25L/100km in my v6 ecotec commodore so coming from that we're not doing too bad! |
| ftw | |
![]() |
|
| Kenody | Jul 14 2006, 11:04 AM Post #42 |
|
Soccer Mom
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
really nice topic bit of confused what should I go for my AS200 any suggestion?hehe~ |
![]() |
|
| Mos | Jul 14 2006, 12:49 PM Post #43 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What do you mean what should you go for? In terms of fuel? In general better (ie more expensive) fuel gives better fuel economy, but it's not always more financially economical. You will probably need to work out the exact numbers for your driving style yourself by trialing fuels. Black: if you got 25 in a commondore that's ridiculous!! (Or it's your driving :P) The cressida averaged 22L/100km when towing a 2.2 Ton trailer - I'm pretty sure the commondore is not 2.8T (And that was with overtaking too Mos. |
|
Admin, Founding Member, Toymods Car Club Inc. 2000 IS200 Sports Luxury 1UZ-FE VVTi 210rwkw Previous: 1991 MX83 Grande 2JZ-GTE 222rwkw, 1984 AE86 Sprinter 4A-GE | |
![]() |
|
| black200 | Jul 14 2006, 02:21 PM Post #44 |
![]()
in my own paradise
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i have graphs! you wanna see graphs? lol my brother drives the car now (gently) and does about 20L/100km. Ive spoken to quite a few VX V6 owners who get exactly the same figures as i used to, they can't believe it either. It seems if you do 95% city driving you will PAY! 280km to 65L LOL Although its not a 2.8T its 3.6L of buick goodness ![]() And what is 2.8L? A stroked 1j? Or is the stock motor 2.8? Or is that a 7m? |
| ftw | |
![]() |
|
| Noel | Jul 14 2006, 03:13 PM Post #45 |
|
Virtual visitor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My RS200 tiptronic will do 500km to a tank if i drive like an old man.... RS200 tank ( 60lt) is smaller than an IS200 though so i think it's ok... No option here in Ireland, it's 95 ron or nothing........... seems to drive fine, was told i should use octane boosters to bring it up as these cars were tuned for japanese 100 ron ....... didn't bother as they ain't cheap! |
|
From Ireland... Drive an RS200Z tiptronic | |
![]() |
|
| xavier | Jul 14 2006, 05:26 PM Post #46 |
|
Edvan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i am driving AS200 too, i reckon u stick to one fuel i.e. 91 octane since the engine is design to use that as the minimum octane level... dun switch to 95 or 96 or 98 and back, that would confuse the ecu, it will use more... if u wanna use 95 or 98 then make sure u used up almost all the fuel and refuel with 95 or 98 and reset the ecu and efi and stick to that octane, then u compare the fuel consumption rate... i would say 95 is good enough as the price difference is not much difference with 91, but using 98 octane would be a little pricey... i am using 91 at the moment cos i know i can get it at all petrol kiosk, unlike some kiosks have 95 and not 98 and vice versa, too much trouble for me... :lol: |
| 99 Altezza AS200Z | |
![]() |
|
| Mos | Jul 14 2006, 08:00 PM Post #47 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sorry, the number should have been 3.8, the T was for ton, ie 3800kg (2200kg for GT4 and trailer, and 1600kg for cressida). What I was saying is a commodore is not 3800kgs and gets worse fuel economy that a TT 3L supra engine moving 3800kgs ![]() Mos. |
|
Admin, Founding Member, Toymods Car Club Inc. 2000 IS200 Sports Luxury 1UZ-FE VVTi 210rwkw Previous: 1991 MX83 Grande 2JZ-GTE 222rwkw, 1984 AE86 Sprinter 4A-GE | |
![]() |
|
| JACK | Aug 8 2006, 10:07 PM Post #48 |
|
N/A Nut
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
had the car 2 weeks and already done 4 50L tanks of 95 I've reset the ECU 3 times now and also decided to clean the MAF sensor 2 days ago. Just finished a Tank tonight and It's gone from 505kms/50L to 595kms/50L after the Sensor clean.... can't wait to see what I can get out of it once I put in Iridiums and a change of oil and gearbox oil and wheel alignment. |
|
RS200Z 6MT Mods: Blitz Panel, SR Muffler, Tom's Brace Frames, TRD Suspension, Philips Utilinon 6500K, Coffee, Half a Brain | |
![]() |
|
| Kenody | Aug 8 2006, 10:26 PM Post #49 |
|
Soccer Mom
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
my baby is running really bad now 390KM/52.54L #95, this is when I driving like nanny... I hav to figure out wots wrong with my car so getting spark plug replaced soon, and full service as well crying.... |
![]() |
|
| DataBitz | Aug 8 2006, 10:41 PM Post #50 |
|
Stock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What model is yours? |
|
DataBitz / Peter 1998 Toyota Altezza RS200Z 5AT - Blue Toyota Front Lip::Boot Lip Spoiler::Toyo T1R Tyres | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Engines • Intakes • Exhausts · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





how do u ppl do it?? i get approx 350km with $80 on BP 98 in my is300



8:28 PM Jul 11