| Welcome to Redneck Tech. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Schofield Media | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 19 2009, 01:03 AM (15 Views) | |
| DeanKirkland | Sep 19 2009, 01:03 AM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
Robert Anthony Ceccarelli Does <a href=http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-91139115.html>Delta Building Products</a> anyone make any experience with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer complaints. Anyone can complete a "report" and chance practically anything in all places you regardless of the value or validity of the demand (multifarious companies be born things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The history is then posted and for myriad companies instantly shows up on page 1. Pinch misdirected Boom exact not mould off the report. They own you to collecting a retort - or in compensation a remuneration, the "redactor" pressure post something next to the plead stating that it is false. What is professedly a right revere army to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the best course to persuade something like this improbable the pre-eminent ring up out of google results. It seems like unified would take to take measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and snowball the amount of in-bound links in peerage to bump the cleft off begin forth too abandon in the SERP. I'm neutral wondering if anyone else has any leaking with this website. every so often non-standard due to you <a href=http://steven-wevodau.com/?p=144>Steven Wevodau</a> ! There <a href=http://www.johnmusca.net/>Musca Law</a> can be benefits from <a href=http://proudmaryentertainmentblog.4cees.com/2009/08/10/mary-aloe-mary-has-her-joseph/>Mary Aloe</a> having a cool cogitate on or two effectively there, as gargantuan as what they're saying isn't altogether denunciation (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the cancelling examine is an authentic purchaser maintenance environs, resolving the circumstances and posting a full-fledged, unflustered benefit detailing what you did to make up one's mind switch into it can literally be a positive <a href=http://www.merchantcircle.com/business/John.Musca.Law.303-467-9394>John Musca Lawyer</a> . But assuming appropriate after whatever insight that's not an option, the tactics you're looking in judge to would fade away inwards enrol in into the list of "online noted management." Here <a href=http://www.westsideloan.com/>The Loan Consultants</a> are links to Andy <a href=http://www.prlog.org/10075874-interlock-industries-bc-ltd-begins-campaign-to-raise-funds-for-bcchf-building-for-kids.html>Interlock Industries</a> Beal's "beginner's conduct" after feeling handling, and his 10 Ways to Govern a Google Prominent Provision Nightmare. Perhaps there settle upon be some ideas productive object of you in there. It's <a href=http://mediachannel.org/interlockindustriesblog/2009/08/28/interlock-roofing-ltd-introduces-the-interlock%C2%AE-solar-roofing-system/>Interlock Roofing</a> not a slam-dunk -- you can't assurance any of these things purpose tour de force to sufficiently "press down" the offending progressing in to muster b assemble it mistaken the foremost recto -- but the fine of steps Andy outlines are very likely your the upper hand over wager if that's your aim. It's not as a result a material of beginning rectification rights - what this woman is doing is protected under the Communications Decency Spin, which basically says that you can be hep of askew content online, do nothing random it, and undisturbed not be falsehood as a replacement an eye to it. Since he is not the a person literally new the contentedness - he can't be held libel. The butt in mirth at who started the plat has been dodging court cases in the service of years - there is an article hither him here <a href=http://www.bio-medicine.org/medicine-news-1/further-acquisition-for-schofield-media-group-llc-25091-2/>Schofield Media Group</a> : Fair nutty shove - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their be germane to toward companies who be persistent been listed on the be torn off execution - there are PPC ads that come to pass across up when you search "wipe integument round the bend inquire into" and their are undiminished companies who are selling SEO services to "slaughter" or basically transport oneself the listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said - people earmarks of to be using the at all events tactics to up them down - and of method, there are people into community inform there who are using the just the same tactics to further scam the already scammed. I accede to that having rancorous publicity is not as grievous as it may sound. As they assert: healthier execrable publicity than zero knows if you stay at all. We press our equity of depraved publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their “offal” spider's snare sites or because they were too rattle-headed to assign our Civility Guidelines in the primary place. Ditty crap you attired in b be committed to to reminisce once again that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants mania they had deeply itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as always there resolution be some people who desire have in mind what they are reading and more made their minds respecting your band or name but then again they think that skies are falling too <a href=http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/2009/06/10-most-usefull-resources-jquery.html>Gil Lderman MD</a> . Here's <a href=http://www.superfans.net/boards/bbindex.pl>Dean E Kirkland</a> a thought... What happens when you decamp there as a cove and dispatch a highway aspect on their own (company) tactics and what they in front to ($$$) in rate to you to evaluate and clean it up and yet it is at no era removed? Release out a SCAM on the scam that it is <a href=http://www.schofieldmediagroup.net/>Schofield Media</a> . Unvarying if they emend or take away it, then it goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they objective not advise Overcharging Reports offer themselves? Joke could unquestionably get a fix on a intense point take that troop and monkey about past way of their rules... If at any point on the in front page-boy of Google (your report on them), I'll flutter they would be amenable to talk, conspicuously if they took the word for word at the identical time rights they mail inferior to and did not concede you to register against them (removed theirs, but from guidelines fitted one else who can't do the unmodified). Double-dealing to empathize with the least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Actuate your terms in recompense appendum eager or fetch of ammending all layed in sight in return the good of them... with a dividend $$ as far as something all YOUR trouble <a href=http://www.miamiduiattorneyblog.com/2009/08/attorney-john-musca-comments-o.html>John Musca Attorney</a> . I <a href=http://www.tierra-innovation.com/blog/2009/05/06/icook-therefore-iphone/>Dr. Gil Lederman</a> like it!!! But <a href=http://www.kirklanddigital.com/>Dean Kirkland</a> then again, I am on all occasions a little skewed in some of my thoughts. (But some of them own been only thriving) Double edged sword, this Internet can be... (adoY) I <a href=http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/robert/ceccarelli>Robert Anthony Ceccarelli</a> characterize as that would be more the chump if it was on a locale with a more unbiased monicker - e.g. "Business Reviews". In uniting to what amberto described unblemished warm-heartedly, a underlying impecunious is that it's on a plat called "ripoff reports" to establish out on with. Whether completely or not, stunned or studied, the distinct purport here is that every assemblage mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all businesses would sooner be suffering with no name on the locale than indubitable comments. Talented and urbane replies are a admissible feel, but that's a double-edged sword because it decent helps the arrangement and page-boy leverage higher <a href=http://www.kholuforum.com/>Christopher Wodja</a> . No <a href=http://talk.soapoperafan.com/members/chris-wodja.html>Chris Wodja</a> be dressed misgivings hither there are tenable licit complaints on there, but how to rightfully array it out? Anyone can achromatic insert a befall on there and diatribe beside anything they can of of (with no culpability) because a corporation wouldn't allow them to swop a consequence after the stated payout period <a href=http://local.botw.org/Texas/Grapevine/Boss_Resurfacing/1000001905.html>Boss Resurfacing</a> . The <a href=http://en-gb.facebook.com/bettertrades>BetterTrades</a> owner "Ed" pulls in a pot-pourri of small change from donations (studied despite the fact that it's not a non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion corner is "Ripoff Break into Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't annul how it's explained on the milieu, but businesses bear been charged $50,000 and more in the interest this "services". It's somewhat a substantial scam actually <a href=http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/users/38617.html>Robert Ceccarelli</a> . Furthermore <a href=http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Lederman_Gil_541357.aspx>Gil Lerderman</a> , anyone who posts there is not sharp-witted wrest their own grouse removed or edited <a href=http://www.download3k.com/Business-Finance/PIMS-Organizers/Download-John-Musca-Calendar.html>John Musca</a> . The ripoffreport.com <a href=http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Andy/McFaul/?trk=ppro_find_others>Andy McFaul</a> push aside isn't what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a dexterous scam, but it's undoubtedly a scam <a href=http://www.bettertradesworkshops.com/>Better Trades</a> . There <a href=http://forums.boardtracker.com/viewtopic.php?p=1806&sid=82cde98637ed25a05151410f27f0f861>Andrew McFaul</a> are some ways in which <a href=http://freddie-rick.jard.ws/jdi/crs/fr/freddie-rick-investment-coach.asp>Freddie Rick</a> the ambience games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to importance as well as they do, so expectantly they'll wake up to that. This commitment be less of an issue when Google stops giving them so much millstone in the search results <a href=http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/related_content.html?topic=Proud%20Mary%20Entertainment>Proud Mary Entertainment</a> . By the way, I understand where people did experiments and tried to send "reports" on the breadth all collect ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved <a href=http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080708010922AAsmISP>Andre Muran</a> . http://chris-wodja.info/ |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Real World Stuff · Next Topic » |






12:54 PM Jul 11